Nice Bids & Plays
On Vugraph on Thursday afternoon, in the France v. Netherlands
match, a few interesting situations occurred, both in bidding and
play.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª J 10 9 © Q 10 8 6 ¨ K 8 7 5 § Q 6 |
ª K Q 3 © K 2 ¨ Q 10 6 4 3 § 10 8 5 |
|
ª A 7 © J 7 3 ¨ 9 2 § A K 9 7 4 2 |
|
ª 8 6 5 4 2 © A 9 5 4 ¨ A J § J 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Voldoire |
Verhees |
Bitran |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Dble |
1NT |
2© |
3§ |
All Pass |
With the friendly breaks in both clubs and the red suits, nine
tricks at NT are very easy. Scoring +130 only thus looked a bad
score for The Netherlands, but…
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Toffier |
Van Eijck |
Duguet |
Westra |
|
|
|
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
WESTRA Berry,
Netherlands |
|
Here, Westra could open 2§ showing a weak hand with both majors.
As a consequence, Van Eijck led a heart against 3NT,
presenting declarer with what should have been his 9th trick.
However, after winning the ©K at trick two, Duguet led the §10 from dummy and Van Eijck
covered with the queen. Later, declarer crossed in spades to
finesse the clubs again…two down and 8 IMPs to the Netherlands
where they should have lost 11.
Two boards later, Bitran found a very nice defensive
play: |
Board 9. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª Q J 8 6 2 © A 9 6 4 ¨ K § A 5 4 |
ª 9 7 3 © Q J 10 5 2 ¨ 10 5 3 § 10 9 |
|
ª A 10 © 8 ¨ A J 7 4 2 § K Q 8 3 2 |
|
ª K 5 4 © K 7 3 ¨ Q 9 8 6 § J 7 6 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Voldoire |
Verhees |
Bitran |
|
1ª |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
Well judged by Bitran to let 3¨ in peace. He might have done even better by
axing it, but that's really asking too much. The defence was worth
retaining it for posterity. Spade lead to the ace, heart to the jack
and ace, ¨K ducked and a
spade to the king. Now trumps had to be continued, and the only
correct card to play now is the ¨Q. After some though, this card made her
appearance on the table/the video screen. Very nice, as declarer
could not ruff a club any more without completely losing control.
Down three, vulnerable for a beautiful 300 to France.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Toffier |
Van Eijck |
Duguet |
Westra |
|
1ª |
2NT |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
3ª |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Westra took the more straightforward view of bidding the full
support value of his hand. The contract duly made, but France had
recouped 4 IMPs.
On the final board of this short report, a difference in bidding
approach led to another good result for the French.
Board 11. Dealer South. None Vul.
|
|
ª Q 9 8 © K 5 2 ¨ K J 10 4 § 6 5 2 |
ª 6 4 © A 10 9 8 ¨ A Q 9 5 2 § J 8 |
|
ª J 3 © Q 7 6 4 ¨ 7 § K Q 9 7 4 3 |
|
ª A K 10 7 5 2 © J 3 ¨ 8 6 3 § A 10 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Voldoire |
Verhees |
Bitran |
|
|
|
1ª |
Dble |
2ª |
3§ |
3¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
When West bid 3¨,
Voldoire had every reason to believe that his hand had
improved considerably. In a sense he was right, but we wonder
what would have happened had Verhees doubled the final
contract. Would that suggest a diamond lead for two ruffs and
one down?
On a passive trump lead, ten tricks were quickly there for
+420 to France. |
|
VOLDOIRE Jean-Michel,
France |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Toffier |
Van Eijck |
Duguet |
Westra |
|
|
|
1ª |
Dble |
2© |
3© |
3ª |
Pass |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
|
|
Here, 2© was a transfer to
show a good raise to 2ª, and
Duguet preferred to show his heart support ahead of his clubs. With
the fit established West had no reason to give any further
information, so North had no idea about the value of his diamonds
and left 4© alone. The
contract went one down of course, but by losing only 50 here France
had scored another 9 IMPs. |