Poland v Italy – Girls Round
4 Going into their Round 3 clash, Poland were handily placed in
fourth while Italy had dropped to sixth after their beating at the
hands of Russia in the previous round and were in need of a quick
recovery
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
K J 6 ♥ K 8 3 2 ♦ A Q 9 8 2 ♣ 5 |
♠ Q
9 ♥ A Q 9 6 4 ♦ K 6 ♣ Q J 8 3 |
|
♠ A 8
5 ♥ J ♦ 10 7 5 3 ♣ A K 9 6 2 |
|
♠
10 7 4 3 2 ♥ 10 7
5 ♦ J
4 ♣ 10 7
4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Poland took an early lead when Marta Maj found a much more
challenging lead against 3NT than did Eleonora Savoca at the other
table. Savoca led a heart and Ewa Grabowska could duck that and,
with the ♥10 coming down, had ten easy
tricks for +430. Maj led the ♠7 to
queen and king, ducked. Kamila Szczepanska continued with the ♠J then her remaining spade to the ace, dummy
pitching a heart. Lisa Ricciarelli ran the jack of hearts next and
Szczepanska found the necessary defence when she ducked, else three
heart tricks give declarer her contract. Now there is a winning line
– to cross to a honour and play ace then queen of hearts – but it is
not clear to play this way. Declarer cashed her clubs and played for
the ♦A to be onside,
hoping also for an even spade break, and that meant one down for –50
and 10 IMPs to Poland.
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
Q J 5 4 3 ♥ 3 ♦ 10 8 ♣ K Q 5 3 2 |
♠ K 8 7
2 ♥ Q 9 ♦ Q 9 6 4 3 ♣ 9 7 |
|
♠ A 10
9 ♥ J 7 6 4 ♦ K J 7 5 2 ♣ 10 |
|
♠
6 ♥ A K 10 8 5 2 ♦ A ♣ A J 8 6 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
|
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All Pass |
|
Savoca,s 2NT rebid showed a good two-suiter and her next call
confirmed that the second suit was clubs. Having already shown a
powerful hand, she did not feel able to go on to slam when Stefania
Marinelli could only jump to 5♣;
+420. Maj upgraded her hand to strong club status – 1♣ was Polish, strong, weak not rump, or 15+
with clubs in this particular version – and 2♥ confirmed the strong variety. Szczepanska
showed the fifth spade then supported clubs – suggesting good
support as she was prepared to go past 3NT facing a potential
four-card suit. Though she signed off at her next turn, Maj trusted
her to have good trumps because she had been unable to cuebid, and
so bid the slam; +920 and 11 IMPs to Poland, ahead by 21-0.
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
9 2 ♥ A K 7 ♦ Q 8 5 ♣ Q J 6 4 2 |
♠ J 10 6 5
4 3 ♥ 8 6 3 ♦ 7 6 3 2 ♣ - |
|
♠ Q
8 ♥ Q J 4 ♦ A J 10 9 4 ♣ 10 9 5 |
|
♠
A K 7 ♥ 10 9 5 2 ♦ K ♣ A K 8 7 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All Pass |
|
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Dble |
3♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
All Pass |
|
This match featured a series of close slam decisions and once
again it was the Polish pair who bid to six, however, this time with
less success. Six Clubs was made at a couple of tables, East
having a genuine problem in the defence if she does not know South’s
distribution – give South the same high cards but 3-3-2-5 shape and
you will see that it becomes necessary to duck when a low diamond is
led off the table. Against 6♣, Irene
Baroni led the ♥6 to dummy’s ace. Maj
drew three rounds of trumps, Baroni pitching ♠6, ♠3, ♦2, where the primary signal
is odd card to encourage, even to discourage and the secondary
signal standard count. When Maj next tried the low diamond,
Ricciarelli instantly went in with her ace and the slam was down one
for –50 and 10 IMPs to Italy
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul. |
|
♠
J 8 ♥ 9 8 6 ♦ J 9 ♣ A Q 9 7 4 3 |
♠ A Q 10 9
5 4 2 ♥ Q 7 ♦ K 10 4 3 ♣ - |
|
♠ K
7 ♥ A J 10 4 2 ♦ A 8 5 ♣ 10 6 5 |
|
♠
6 3 ♥ K 5 3 ♦ Q 7 6 2 ♣ K J 8 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
6♦ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Dble |
3♣ |
4♠ |
All |
|
|
This looks to be a deal on which opposition bidding might
actually be helpful, yet it was the pair who were given a free run
who reached the cold slam. Baroni’s 3♠
rebid was well judged, as she rightly put more emphasis on her great
playing strength than on the low point-count. Ricciarelli cuebid
then bid diamonds again in hope of hearing a heart cuebid. When one
was not forthcoming she settled for the small slam. Szczepanska
found the most challenging lead, a heart, but Baroni decided that
the simple line of finessing at trick one was the best and a few
seconds later she had twelve tricks; +1430. Marinelli’s 2♣ overcall allowed her partner to raise and now
Edyta Jurkiewicz jumped to 4♠. I find
Grabowska’s pass a little surprising as she has very good cards
facing a self-supporting spade suit and short clubs; +680 but 13
IMPs to Italy and the lead at 23-21.
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul. |
|
♠
K J 10 9 6 ♥ - ♦ K 7 6 2 ♣ K 8 4 3 |
♠ Q 7 5 3
2 ♥ - ♦ A J 9 8 5 ♣ Q 7 6 |
|
♠ 8
4 ♥ A K J 9 8 5 ♦ Q 4 ♣ J 10 5 |
|
♠
A ♥ Q 10 7 6 4 3
2 ♦ 10
3 ♣ A 9
2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
Maj must have had difficulty in believing the auction as hearts
were bid no less than three times on her right. She did not double
as E/W could have had a better spot available, but you could say
that she was not too displeased to be defending 3♥. The ♦10 went to the king and declarer overtook her queen
on the diamond return to play another winning diamond for a spade
pitch. Maj ruffed and cashed the ace of spades then played ace and
another club to partner’s king. The ♠K
was ruffed low and over-ruffed and Maj got out with a club. Declarer
could make three trump tricks from here for down four and
–200. Jurkiewicz could open 2♠ to show
spades and a minor and when that came round to Savoca she jumped to
4♥ – a bit wild in my view with such a
broken suit and limited values. Grabowska doubled 4♥ and beat it three after a spade lead; -500
and 12 IMPs to Poland.
Board 15. Dealer South. N/S Vul.
|
|
♠
K J 4 ♥ 9 7 4 ♦ 5 ♣ A K Q 5 4 2 |
♠
9 ♥ 6 5 2 ♦ K J 10 6 4 2 ♣ 10 8 7 |
|
♠ Q 10 7 6
3 2 ♥ Q 10 8 ♦ Q ♣ 9 6 3 |
|
♠
A 8 5 ♥ A K J 3 ♦ A 9 8 7 3 ♣ J |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
|
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Italy gained an IMP for an extra overtrick but the board was much
more interesting at other tables where 6♣
was reached. On a diamond lead, declarer will win, cash the
♣J and try to come to hand to draw the
remaining trumps. If her choice is to ruff a diamond, she will be
over-ruffed. Say that East now switches to a heart; declarer still
needs to get to hand. She can succeed by winning the heart and
playing a spade to the king, relying on four heart winners, or
indeed by ruffing a diamond high then playing on hearts, but it is
tempting to play a spade to the jack, as that only requires a later
heart finesse rather than both finesse and break – and down you
go. On a spade lead, declarer’s spade loser disappears but there
is still a problem after unblocking the club. Ace and another
diamond gets over-ruffed and now a spade ruff sets the contract.
Declarer is still alive if he leads a spade after the ♣J. It gets ruffed, of course, but how does he
now play if West switches to a diamond? To succeed he has to ruff a
diamond high, and will he have sufficient reason to play for
diamonds to be six-one? The match was level with five boards to
play, a fair reflection of the play perhaps. But now Poland took
control.
Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
A Q J 10 ♥ 9 4 ♦ 10 8 7 4 2 ♣ K 8 |
♠ 9 5
4 ♥ A K J 5 2 ♦ K 6 5 ♣ Q 4 |
|
♠ K
8 ♥ Q 10 8 ♦ J 9 3 ♣ J 9 6 3 2 |
|
♠
7 6 3 2 ♥ 7 6 3 ♦ A Q ♣ A 10 7 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♥ |
3♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
1♥ |
Dble |
1NT(i) |
2♠ |
3♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
(i) Good heart raise Three Hearts is not a great spot but it
has the merit of making as the cards lie – which for many people is
the definition of a good contract; +140. Curiously, where N/S had
been willing to sell out to 3♥ at the
table where North made an immediate take-out double, they pressed on
to 3♠ at the table where North only
balanced, Maj loving her three low hearts. Baroni cashed two top
hearts then switched to a diamond, giving the overtrick; +170 and 7
IMPs to Poland. Italy picked up 2 IMPs on the next board for an
extra undertrick, then:
Board 18. Dealer East. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
Q 8 4 ♥ 9 ♦ 8 6 4 ♣ A 10 7 6 5 3 |
♠ K 7 6 5
3 ♥ J 2 ♦ K 9 3 ♣ K 8 2 |
|
♠ J 10
2 ♥ A K 10 4 ♦ A Q J 2 ♣ J 9 |
|
♠
A 9 ♥ Q 8 7 6 5
3 ♦ 10 7
5 ♣ Q 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
|
1NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
|
|
1NT |
2♦(i) |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
(i) One major Neither game is particularly attractive but it
is normal to reach game and many pairs played the five-three spade
fit. Against 4♠, Szczepanska led her
heart to dummy’s ace and Baroni passed the jack of spades to the
queen. Szczepanska switched to a diamond, won in hand to play a
spade to the ten and ace. A heart ruff and the ace of clubs meant
one down for –50. In the other room it looks to be a bit of a
gamble to jump to 3NT with only jack-doubleton in the suit which is
surely held on your right, but it worked out fine for Jurkiewicz.
Soft defence meant that Grabowska emerged with no less than eleven
tricks; +460 and 11 IMPs to Poland.
Board 19. Dealer East. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
A 6 3 2 ♥ 10 4 ♦ Q J 4 ♣ A K 7 2 |
♠ J 10
9 ♥ K 9 8 6 2 ♦ 10 8 3 ♣ Q 5 |
|
♠ 8 5
4 ♥ A Q J 7 5 3 ♦ 7 ♣ J 9 8 |
|
♠
K Q 7 ♥ - ♦ A K 9 6 5 2 ♣ 10 6 4 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
|
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Six Diamonds is an excellent contract and 6♣ also very good. Maybe the Poles could have
got there had Szczepanska bid 4♦ over 3♠ - I am assuming
that 4♦ would be
forcing – as South has an easy 4♥ cuebid.
Anyway, bidding the diamond game proved to be all that was required
to pick up a game swing as the Italians had a disaster in the other
room. I do not understand the final 3NT bid as surely South has
shown decent spades by repeating that suit rather than bidding
3♥ over 3♦ and there is no reason to imagine that the hearts
are not wide open. 3NT was down two for –100, going with +420 in
5♦ to give Poland
another 11 IMPs.
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul. |
|
♠
K 10 6 3 ♥ 4 ♦ K Q 5 4 3 ♣ A 10 8 |
♠ J
5 ♥ A K Q J 8 5 ♦ 8 ♣ J 7 5 2 |
|
♠ Q 7
2 ♥ 7 6 3 ♦ A 7 2 ♣ Q 9 4 3 |
|
♠
A 9 8 4 ♥ 10 9 2 ♦ J 10 9 6 ♣ K 6 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Baroni |
Szczepanska |
Ricciarelli |
Maj |
|
1♥ |
Dble |
2♥ 2♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jurkiewicz |
Marinelli |
Grabowska |
Savoca |
1♥ |
Dble |
1NT(i) |
2♠ |
3♥ |
3♠ |
All Pass |
|
(i) Good heart raise Poland closed out the match by bidding
another thin game not reached in the other room. While I understand
where it came from, I think Baroni’s 4♥
call was the problem – had she settled for 3♥ I suspect that Szczepanska would have bid
only 3♠ and that might have ended the
auction. Four Hearts gave North two ways in which a 4♠ bid might work out well – if either game was
making – and from West’s perspective it was not likely that 4♥ would succeed. Anyway, both declarers made
ten tricks without much pain; +170 to Italy but +620 to Poland an 10
more Polish IMPs. Their late surge gave Poland a 75-38 IMP win,
converting to 23-7 VPs. |