The Sunday Swiss, Round 3
Herbst v. Gromova
by Jos Jacobs
After two rounds, a few teams had done extremely
well in scoring 50 and 46 V.P. Behind them, there were many teams
with between 36 and 40 V.P. Two of these, Herbst and Gromova, had to
play each other at table 4. In the Closed Room, not very much seemed
to be happening, but in the Open Room it was action all the time,
and some very interesting bridge too. It started right on the very
first board:
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
♠
J 8 6 4 3 ♥ A 4 ♦ 10 8 ♣ Q J 8 6 |
♠ K
7 ♥ 8 7 6 ♦ A Q 7 4 3 ♣ 9 7 2 |
|
♠
9 ♥ K J 10 9 3 2 ♦ J 2 ♣ 10 5 4 3 |
|
♠
A Q 10 5 2 ♥ Q 5 ♦ K 9 6 5 ♣ A K |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Gromov |
Michielsen |
Gromova |
|
2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
When Gromov opened his rather weak two-suiter, the spade game was
quickly reached. East, with nothing to guide her, had to find a lead
and came out with the ♥J. When the queen
in dummy held, ten tricks were very easy. Gromova +420.
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dubinin |
Van Cleeff |
Ponomareva |
Van Ettinger |
|
Pass |
2♦ |
Dble |
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Once Jan van Cleeff elected not to open his famous “Muiderberg”
2♠ (Polish-style weak two-suiter but the
minor need not be a five-card suit) EW were offered the chance to
produce some noise, and they duly did. After the Multi 2♦ West could show his values
by jumping to 3♥. This of course did not
deter North from introducing his spade support, so the final
contract became a normal enough 4♠. The difference with the proceedings at
the other table was that East had something to guide her in
selecting the best opening lead. So out came the ♦J, a little speculative maybe, but a
very good shot with the actual layout. Careful defence will beat the
contract now, and careful declarer play might make the defenders’
life a little more difficult. There are four possible losers: two
diamonds, a heart and a trump trick. The heart can go on the top
clubs, but declarer cannot come to hand in time after unblocking
dummy’s top clubs. So West should win the first diamond trick and
play a heart immediately. If declarer covers the ♦J with the king, the switch is almost
automatic, so better play is to duck the opening lead. Now West has
to overtake with the ♦Q
and switch to a heart. At the table the ♦J was covered with king and ace after
which West played a heart. One down. Gromova +50 and the first 10
IMPs. On board 18 both teams overbid to a hopeless 4♥, down two, and might even consider themselves
lucky that nobody doubled this. No score. Next came a slam that
proved too difficult for most of the playing room:
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
♠
10 6 3 ♥ K 8 4 2 ♦ 8 7 5 4 ♣ 5 2 |
♠ K Q J 9
5 4 ♥ - ♦ K 9 6 ♣ K Q J 6 |
|
♠
A ♥ J 10 9 7 6 ♦ A 3 2 ♣ A 10 9 7 |
|
♠
8 7 2 ♥ A Q 5 3 ♦ Q J 10 ♣ 8 4 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dubinin |
Van Cleeff |
Ponomareva |
Van Ettinger |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
7♣ |
All Pass |
|
|
Very well done indeed. The key to the grand is of course East’s
raise to 4♣, bypassing 3NT in what still
remained a fully natural auction.. The same auction was produced
by Loek Verhees and Anneke Simons (team Pasman) in their match
against the Hecht Johansen team. However, when Dorte Cilleborg and
Lars Blakset also reached 7♣ (auction
unknown but mainly the same, one assumes), this board was a very
honourable, but also a remarkable push in that match. Why
remarkable? Well, it turned out that in most matches, reaching a
small slam was enough for a swing in your favour. So why should
Herbst/Michielsen feel unhappy about their sequence at the other
table of this match?
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Gromov |
Michielsen |
Gromova |
|
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
When Ilan Herbst chose to rebid 3♠ the
club fit was lost. Marion Michielsen did well to proceed with a
cuebid over 3♠, so getting to 6♠ was easy enough. Their combined efforts would
have won the board for them in most other matches, but in their
actual match it cost them 12 IMPs. Gromova led 22-0 now. On the
next board, Van Cleeff reached a thin game when he opened a 15-17
h.c.p. 1NT on a 14-count:
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul. |
|
♠
K 10 7 ♥ A 8 ♦ A 10 8 4 ♣ Q J 9 2 |
♠ A Q 3
2 ♥ J 6 5 4 ♦ 7 6 ♣ K 10 6 |
|
♠ 9 8
5 ♥ K 10 3 2 ♦ Q J 9 3 ♣ 5 4 |
|
♠
J 6 4 ♥ Q 9 7 ♦ K 5 2 ♣ A 8 7 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dubinin |
Van Cleeff |
Ponomareva |
Van Ettinger |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
With everything well-placed for declarer, he could not go wrong.
The ♥2 was led to the jack and ace and a
club honour went to the king. A heart came back, East ducking and
the clubs were cashed. Next came the ♠J.
When West grabbed his ace and the hearts proved to be 4-4, a
successful finesse of the ♠Q saw declarer
home. Herbst +600.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Gromov |
Michielsen |
Gromova |
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
In the Closed Room, they were less ambitious and eight tricks
were made on a heart lead. Another slam, but an easier one, came
next:
Board 21. Dealer North. N/S Vul.
|
|
♠
K Q 8 5 4 ♥ A K ♦ A J ♣ K 8 6 5 |
♠ J 9
2 ♥ 6 3 ♦ 8 5 4 3 ♣ Q 9 7 4 |
|
♠ 6
3 ♥ 10 8 7 ♦ 10 9 6 2 ♣ A J 3 2 |
|
♠
A 10 7 ♥ Q J 9 5 4
2 ♦ K Q
7 ♣ 10 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dubinin |
Van Cleeff |
Ponomareva |
Van Ettinger |
|
2NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
6♣ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
3♦ was a transfer
and 4♣ either a cuebid or a second suit.
The strange thing is that the spades never entered the picture. It
might have been possible to refuse the transfer, not an attractive
idea when the doubleton heart is AK if you are at all playing this
special agreement. On this board, it did not really matter, but the
heart slam (and the spade slam too) is a shade inferior to 6NT,
certainly at matchpoints. An overtrick was made when East led a
spade rather than his ♣A.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Gromov |
Michielsen |
Gromova |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
6NT |
All Pass |
|
The Strong Club solved the problems quite well. 2♥ was a game force with hearts, and 2♠ was natural and showed a fivecard suit. Once
South could raise spades, North was in full control and selected the
correct final contract without any hesitation. Well done. The
board earned the Israeli-Dutch team 1 IMP when Michielsen led the
♣A – it turned out to be the only way to
score a trick with it. The next board saw a partscore swing of 5
IMPs go the Russian way when at both tables they set their opponents
by one trick in 3 of a major. Then came the penultimate board, a
subtle lesson in defence.
Board 23. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
♠
A ♥ K J 8 4 3 2 ♦ 7 5 3 ♣ A 4 3 |
♠ 7
5 ♥ 9 7 ♦ A K 9 4 2 ♣ J 9 8 5 |
|
♠ K Q J 6
3 2 ♥ Q 10 5 ♦ Q J ♣ Q 6 |
|
♠
10 9 8 4 ♥ A 6 ♦ 10 8 6 ♣ K 10 7 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dubinin |
Van Cleeff |
Ponomareva |
Van Ettinger |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Dble |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
2♠ |
All Pass |
With all these soft values, East wisely refrained from an
immediate 2♠, but when West doubled
2♠ quickly became inevitable. You lead
the ♥A against 2♠ and what next? If you simply continue the
suit on partner’s encouraging signal, North will win the king and
play the ♥2 for you to ruff in front of
dummy. The rest should be easy: ♣K (!)
and a club, followed by another heart. Declarer can ruff this high
and cross to dummy to lead a spade felling the ace, but after that
another heart will create a third defensive trump trick after all
for down two, vulnerable. This nice scenario was no longer
possible, however, when a trump was returned at trick 2…
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Gromov |
Michielsen |
Gromova |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2♥ |
All Pass |
|
EW did well to avoid getting to 2♠. In
2♥ NS had no trouble in coming to the
eight tricks there were always there for them. So another
partscore swing, 6 IMPs this time, for the Russians who won the
match 35-11 or 23-7 V.P. |