Quarterfinal
Herbst v. Armstrong
by Jos Jacobs
The most interesting of the quarterfinal pairings no doubt was
the match between the Herbst and Armstrong teams. The reason for
this was a very peculiar one: it really is a rarity to see two
mainly Dutch teams meeting on the occasion of an international
championship. As the losing semifinalists would not have a playoff
for the bronze, it also meant that the Netherlands contingent could
already be sure of their first medal before this match started.
So much for the patriotism; time to go over to the action. For
the first half, it would be Jan van Cleeff and Elisabeth van
Ettinger against John Armstrong and Nicola Smith in the Open Room
and Jan Jansma with Carla Arnolds against Ilan Herbst and Roni Bar
in the Closed Room. The scorers were troubled right at the start
of the match:
Board 1. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
♠
J 9 8 ♥ A Q 10 ♦ 9 7 6 5 3 ♣ A 4 |
♠ K
6 ♥ 9 8 7 5 4 ♦ K Q J 2 ♣ 7 2 |
|
♠ 5 4
2 ♥ J 6 2 ♦ A 10 8 ♣ Q 9 6 5 |
|
♠
A Q 10 7 3 ♥ K 3 ♦ 4 ♣ K J 10 8 3 |
In the Closed Room, they easily got to 4♠ via a Drury 2♣
response by North over South’s 1♠
opening. Carla Arnolds then simply bid 4♠
and had little trouble in producing the ten tricks required. On the
actual layout and forcing defence in diamonds, she might well have
made an overtrick on what basically comes down to a dummy reversal.
After ruffing three diamonds the 13 th diamond becomes the 11 th
trick. Not that it mattered very much here, except for the
connoisseurs at and around the table, but in the Open Room, it might
have mattered. NS had a bidding misunderstanding and ended up in
5♣ which had to go one down. However,
there would have been a very reasonable play to land even 5♠ and that’s what makes a misunderstanding like
this one a lot more painful. Armstrong +10 IMPs. Two boards
later, a slam came along, but it was not easy at all.
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
K Q 3 ♥ A 10 9 7
6 ♦ A K 9
6 ♣ 8 |
♠ A 5
4 ♥ J 4 2 ♦ 8 5 2 ♣ 9 6 5 3 |
|
♠ 10 7
2 ♥ K Q 8 3 ♦ 10 3 ♣ Q 10 7 4 |
|
♠
J 9 8 6 ♥ 5 ♦ Q J 7 4 ♣ A K J 2 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Jansma |
Bar |
Arnolds |
|
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
6♦ |
All Pass |
|
West leads a trump. With every suit behaving, landing the slam
was not so difficult but behind the screens we are still wondering
what the best line would have been. The plan to ruff two spades
followed by Arnolds worked well anyway, though it needed spades 3-3
(or the last trump with the 4 th spade) in the end as there was no
quick entry back to hand after the first club ruff. ♦A, ♣A, ♣ ruff, ♠ to jack
and ace, trump taken by the queen, ♣
ruff. Now, declarer has to cash dummy’s spades first before ruffing
herself back to hand with ♥A and a ♥ ruff. Hair-raising play, it looked from
dummy’s point of view, whose main concern in fact had been the trump
suit. Please note the nice cuebid of 4♥ with the singleton, possible now after the
3NT signoff. The Herbst team got its revenge when the Israeli
pair bid to an easy grand on board 10:
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul. |
|
♠
5 4 3 ♥ 10 8 7 6
3 ♦ 8 ♣ 10 9 7 5 |
♠ A K J 10
8 7 ♥ 9 ♦ Q 3 ♣ Q 8 4 2 |
|
♠
Q ♥ A K J 2 ♦ A J 9 5 ♣ A K J 3 |
|
♠
9 6 2 ♥ Q 5 4 ♦ K 10 7 6 4 2 ♣ 6 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Armstrong |
Van Cleeff |
Smith |
Van Ettinger |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
6♣ |
Pass |
6NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Whenever partner produces a positive response in the singleton of
a strong 4-4-4-1 opposite, there will be trouble. We have seen that
often enough and it occurred again this time. Though the club suit
seemed to have come into the picture the uncertainty was already
there and thus the grand was missed.
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Jansma |
Bar |
Arnolds |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
7♣ |
All Pass |
|
|
Once Roni Bar decided to go quiet by opening 1 ♣ it was virtually impossible to miss the
grand. Had they been able to show the singleton QUEEN of spades in
the process, they would no doubt have reached the top spot of 7NT.
Their grand slam in clubs was good enough to bring them a much
needed swing of 12 IMPs anyway.
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vul.
|
|
♠
J 2 ♥ K 9 4 3 ♦ 10 7 6 5 ♣ 10 9 3 |
♠ 9 8 7 6
5 4 3 ♥ Q 8 5 ♦ J 4 ♣ 8 |
|
♠ K
Q ♥ 7 ♦ K Q 8 3 2 ♣ A K Q J 7 |
|
♠
A 10 ♥ A J 10 6
2 ♦ A
9 ♣ 6 5 4 2
|
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Armstrong |
Van Cleeff |
Smith |
Van Ettinger |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Dble |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Dble |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
Declarer’s spade pips were decisive here. The defence played and
continued hearts, so dummy had to ruff with an honour. The diamonds
went away on the top clubs but it did not matter any more. There
still was another losing heart to be ruffed and declarer could not
manoeuvre the hand any more. After ruffing himself back to hand he
had to lead a spade to South’s 10 and the return of the 4 th club
meant that the ♠J had to score a
third defensive trick with the ace of trumps still to come. Well
done.
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Jansma |
Bar |
Arnolds |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
At the table I thought that the only adequate description of Roni
Bar’s pass of 2♠ can be: “superhuman.”
Making five against different defence (planned to beat 2♠ of course) gained the Herbst team another 7
IMPs so they went into the halftime interval with a deficit of just
1 IMP. An interesting second segment looked likely, and so it turned
out too! For the second half, Roni Bar would be replaced by
Marion Michielsen, another Dutch player to increase the percentage
of Dutchness of the teams playing even more. She would partner Ilan
Herbst in the Closed Room against the British, whereas the four
other Dutch would fight it out between them in the Open Room, the
main difference being that we are all on Tenerife instead of, for
example, in Utrecht at the Dutch Federation (NBB)
headquarters. Muiderberg backfired against its inventor on the
first board:
Board 15. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
♠
K 9 5 ♥ A J 9 4
3 ♦ K J 10
6 ♣ 2 |
♠ A 10
3 ♥ K 8 7 5 2 ♦ 8 7 5 4 ♣ 4 |
|
♠ Q 8
2 ♥ Q ♦ A 3 2 ♣ A J 9 7 6 3 |
|
♠
J 7 6 4 ♥ 10 6 ♦ Q 9 ♣ K Q 10 8 5 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Van Cleeff |
Arnolds |
Van Ettinger |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
2♣ |
Dble |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Once Jansma decided not to open the West hand with its bad suits,
it was left to NS to find a decent spot. In fact, 2♥ was a sensible enough place, but when trumps
broke 5-1 Van Cleeff had to concede one down. Armstrong +50.
Closed Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Armstrong |
Michielsen |
Smith |
|
|
|
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
All Pass |
|
|
When Herbst opened the West hand, his side was in trouble. He was
lucky that nobody could double the final contract, reached after
Michielsen’s 3♣, “pass or correct” for
the minors. Another down four, 200 more and 6 IMPs for
Armstrong. Two boards later the IMPs lost came back for
Herbst:
Board 17. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
♠
5 3 ♥ K 6 4 2 ♦ K 7 6 5 ♣ K Q 9 |
♠ A K J 10
6 ♥ Q J 9 8 5 ♦ 4 ♣ 5 4 |
|
♠ Q
8 ♥ A 3 ♦ Q 3 ♣ J 10 8 7 6 3 2 |
|
♠
9 7 4 2 ♥ 10 7 ♦ A J 10 9 8 2 ♣ A |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Van Cleeff |
Arnolds |
Van Ettinger |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
2♦ |
2♥ |
Dble |
3♦ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
With EW never entering the auction, NS were left to play a quiet
3♦ which they made
easily, even with an overtrick. Herbst +130.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Armstrong |
Michielsen |
Smith |
|
Pass |
3♣ |
All Pass |
In the Closed Room, Michielsen’s 3♣, a
quite normal-looking preempt these days, had the unexpected effect
of shutting out everyone. Though it can be defeated on the lead of
the ♣A and a diamond underlead next, it
is no surprise that it was duly made for another +110 to Herbst and
6 IMPs back. A few boards later, Armstrong struck again when
Jansma found a little Canapé:
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul. |
|
♠
Q 10 3 ♥ A K 9 8 7
6 ♦ 8 4 3
2 ♣ - |
♠ A K
4 ♥ J 3 2 ♦ 6 ♣ K J 10 6 5 4 |
|
♠ J 7 6 5
2 ♥ Q 4 ♦ A K Q J 9 5 ♣ - |
|
♠
9 8 ♥ 10 5 ♦ 10 7 ♣ A Q 9 8 7 3 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Van Cleeff |
Arnolds |
Van Ettinger |
1♣ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Dble |
4♠ |
All Pass |
When Carla Arnolds refrained from ruffing the third round of
hearts with the jack, she found herself one down in a contract she
could have made. But the board still was a gain for her team:
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Armstrong |
Michielsen |
Smith |
1♣ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
All Pass |
|
|
Herbst could not believe his partner had introduced another
five-card suit at the three-level, so he rebid his clubs again, much
to the liking of South who quietly passed and collected
400. Armstrong 7 IMPs to lead by 11 at this stage. But then
the tide turned:
Board 22. Dealer East. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
Q 4 ♥ K 7 2 ♦ K J 9 5 4 2 ♣ Q 7 |
♠ K 8
3 ♥ Q J 6 4 ♦ Q 10 7 ♣ K 10 6 |
|
♠ A 10 9 7
2 ♥ A 10 ♦ A 6 3 ♣ J 9 4 |
|
♠
J 6 5 ♥ 9 8 5 3 ♦ 8 ♣ A 8 5 3 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Van Cleeff |
Arnolds |
Van Ettinger |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
3♦ |
4♠ |
All Pass |
2NT showed a spade raise, but the straight jump to 4♠ maybe came too quickly. Had East given her
partner the chance to express an opinion, it might well have
resulted in a double for a profitable 500 or 800. And there was
another possible development, as was shown at the other table:
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Armstrong |
Michielsen |
Smith |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
1NT |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
When Herbst expressed his type of hand by rebidding 2NT,
Michielsen had no trouble in raising that to game. North led a
heart, but with the clubs never playing a role of any importance,
declarer had the time to eventually endplay North for an overtrick.
Herbst 12 IMPs to go into the lead by 1 now. There was more to
come for them:
Board 24. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
♠
J 10 9 6 ♥ 10 8 ♦ 9 8 6 4 ♣ 6 4 2 |
♠
2 ♥ K 7 5 3 ♦ J 10 3 2 ♣ K 10 8 7 |
|
♠ A K Q 8
7 4 3 ♥ 6 ♦ K 5 ♣ A 9 5 |
|
♠
5 ♥ A Q J 9 4 2 ♦ A Q 7 ♣ Q J 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Van Cleeff |
Arnolds |
Van Ettinger |
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♠ |
All Pass |
A stylish auction led to a careful contract. Ten tricks made.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Armstrong |
Michielsen |
Smith |
Pass |
Pass |
4♠ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Once again, Michielsen’s opening bid showed youthful enterprise,
and once again it was well-timed. South made a double she soon was
to regret. She led her two aces, making declarer’s task very easy,
but even on best defence (a trump lead) the squeeze will do its job
once declarer leads up to the ♥K at an
early stage. +590 and 9 more IMPs to Herbst. And the next
board:
Board 25. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
♠
K 10 8 ♥ A 9 7 4
3 ♦ 10 8
4 ♣ 6 2 |
♠ J 9 7
2 ♥ 10 6 2 ♦ 6 5 ♣ A 10 8 7 |
|
♠ A Q 5 4
3 ♥ Q 5 ♦ J 9 3 ♣ K J 5 |
|
♠
6 ♥ K J 8 ♦ A K Q 7 2 ♣ Q 9 4 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Van Cleeff |
Arnolds |
Van Ettinger |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
2♦ |
3♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
4♥ |
All Pass |
|
Van Ettinger chose to overcall 2♦ rather than double for take-out at her first turn.
This resulted in 3♠ coming back to her.
As her hand was easily worth one more action, her double at the
second attempt gave her partner the opportunity to introduce his
five-card heart suit. Nicely bid for a well-deserved +450.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Herbst |
Armstrong |
Michielsen |
Smith |
|
Pass |
1♠ |
Dble |
2♠ |
3♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
The disadvantage of an immediate take-out double was shown in the
replay. Though the South hand looks strong enough, the knowledge
that partner need not hold five hearts means that a raise to four is
far from obvious. Three Spades went one down so Herbst had scored
another 8 IMPs to lead by 18 with three boards to go. An
overtrick on 26 meant they could even afford to let 4♠ slip through on 27 to lose 10. The final
score thus became 59-50 to Herbst, who would go on to meet the
Swedish Goldberg team in the Semifinals. |