The Mixed Pairs Final,
Session 2
by Jos Jacobs
Halfway through the Mixed Pairs Final, the Helness couple from
Norway were leading the field with a small margin over Sylvie
Willard and Hervé Mouďel from France and a relative big margin over
the rest of the field. So an eventual win by one of these two pairs
was in the air and therefore the Bulletin team split up to watch at
both their tables. The French did not have a particularly good
start, but the Norwegians, after their first 10 boards, looked
almost sure of achieving a remarkable double after their win in the
Mixed teams the day before. A fair share of luck and good play is
all you need to win a pairs event. Below, I will present some of the
boards played by the winners in the order they had to play them.
This not only seems logical, but as we shall see there is also a
very special reason for it. Board 19, the third board played at
the Helness table, was typical for their combination of luck and
good bridge.
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
♠
7 3 ♥ Q 8 4 2 ♦ K 10 4 ♣ A 10 5 4 |
♠ K 10 5
2 ♥ 10 9 7 ♦ J 5 3 2 ♣ J 2 |
|
♠ J
6 ♥ K 6 3 ♦ A Q 8 7 6 ♣ K 7 3 |
|
♠
A Q 9 8 4 ♥ A J
5 ♦ 9 ♣ Q 9 8 6 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Jansma |
Helness |
Arnolds |
Helness |
|
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
1NT |
2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Their luck of course was that Jansma made a rather adventurous
raise, and the good bridge was that Gunn Helness reopened with a
double happily converted by Tor. On a club lead to the ace and a
heart return, down two was nearly inevitable when Arnolds put up the
king to lose three quick heart tricks. Probably she had to, as the
difference between –200 and –500 would have been marginal anyway.
Needless to say that 500 was worth all the matchpoints. In the
next round, they inflicted another penalty upon their vulnerable
opponents:
Board 22. Dealer East. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
8 7 6 2 ♥ K Q 8
7 ♦ J 9 8
7 ♣ A |
♠ A K Q J
5 ♥ 9 6 4 2 ♦ 10 ♣ 8 3 2 |
|
♠ 9 4
3 ♥ J 10 ♦ K 4 2 ♣ Q J 9 7 4 |
|
♠
10 ♥ A 5 3 ♦ A Q 6 5 3 ♣ K 10 6 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Trapani |
Helness |
Popa |
Helness |
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
1♠ |
Dble |
2♠ |
3♣ |
3♠ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
Once again, Tor did not bother about a possible game or even slam
(yes, it makes!) but went for the sure plus against his vulnerable
opponents. He led the ♣A and immediately
shifted to a trump to ensure three undertricks and +800 for 47
m.p. On the following board, we saw a remarkable effect of
opening four-card majors:
Board 23. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
♠
J 4 2 ♥ Q 6 4 ♦ J 9 6 ♣ 9 8 4 3 |
♠ 10 9 8
5 ♥ K 7 5 ♦ A Q 10 3 ♣ 7 6 |
|
♠ K
6 ♥ 10 9 8 ♦ K 7 5 4 ♣ A K J 10 |
|
♠
A Q 7 3 ♥ A J 3
2 ♦ 8
2 ♣ Q 5 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Fantoni |
Helness |
Scalamogna |
Helness |
|
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♣ |
All Pass |
It’s as easy as this: if South opens 1♣, as would happen at many tables, EW can never
end in 2♣. It may be true that East has a
difficult decision about how to reopen, but South’s systemic 1♥ made it almost impossible for her to find a
double or a 1NT balancing bid. This way, the Helness couple score
another 40 m.p. Over now to a zero for the Helness couple, a
plain a zero as I have ever seen and a fully unjustified zero
too:
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
8 7 5 ♥ J 8 6 4
3 ♦ K
10 ♣ Q 10 8 |
♠ A K
4 ♥ A K 9 ♦ Q 9 6 4 3 ♣ J 5 |
|
♠ 10
3 ♥ 10 2 ♦ A J 8 7 ♣ A K 9 7 3 |
|
♠
Q J 9 6 2 ♥ Q 7
5 ♦ 5
2 ♣ 6 4 2 |
This board was the 13 th board played by the Helness couple in
the afternoon session and look at what happened:
West |
North |
East |
South |
Wladow |
Helness |
Nehmert |
Helness |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
6NT |
Pass |
7NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Though this bidding does not seem to make any sense at all when
you see the cards, this is by no means true. Pony Nehmert was kind
enough to explain to me what really had gone wrong. She and Dr.
Wladow are playing Precision, so until 3♦ everything was according to system.
The problem arose from the 4♦ bid: this was RKC for one of the bid suits, but Pony
was unsure if it was the first or the second agreed suit. Her 4♠ then showed 3 keycards for one of the minors
as trumps. To end the auction she next decided to go all out to 6NT
over the further inquiry (4NT), but Wladow was not to be content
with it and raised to the grand. Tor Helness led the ♥3 and then the director was called. He removed
the board from the table and summoned the players to play the next
board first. After the completion of board 4 the TD came back and
next ordered the dummy, Nehmert, to come over and play the hand!
What had happened? Wladow thought he would be dummy and had
exchanged hands with Gunn Helness, his screenmate. So it was now
up to Nehmert to show her ability in finessing. She won the heart
lead, played a diamond to the ten and jack, followed by the ♦A felling the king. After
the run of the diamonds and the ♠A her
next move was to run the ♣J. When this
held, an unlikely grand slam had come home for all the matchpoints
(no doubt about that!). It also turned the tide for the Helness
couple. From that moment on, their luck seemed to have left them
almost completely until near the end. At their penultimate table,
this was the second board:
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
♠
9 8 6 2 ♥ K 7 ♦ Q J 10 8 ♣ J 5 2 |
♠ Q
J ♥ A J 10 5 ♦ 6 4 ♣ A Q 10 8 7 |
|
♠ A 10 5
4 ♥ 9 8 6 3 2 ♦ 3 ♣ K 9 4 |
|
♠
K 7 3 ♥ Q 4 ♦ A K 9 7 5 2 ♣ 6 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Golebiowski |
Helness |
Zalewska |
Helness |
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
2♠ |
Dble |
3♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
Finally, their luck had come back when their opponents
voluntarily missed a game. The real reason to include this board in
this report, however, has to be found at another table:
West |
North |
East |
South |
Versace |
Berendregt |
Cuzzi |
Chorus |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
4♥ |
4♠ (?!) |
All Pass |
As South told me: “I went down five smiling all the way, and it
was contagious too, as Alfredo eventually joined in the laughter.”
Anyway, 38 m.p. for NS on the board, the last of the tournament at
this table. The Helness couple needed a reasonable final table,
so it proved, to win the event. They had a chance to do very well on
the first board of the two:
Board 15. Dealer South. N/S Vul.
|
|
♠
10 5 3 ♥ K 10 ♦ A Q J ♣ Q J 10 9 2 |
♠ A K
4 ♥ A 7 5 ♦ K 6 2 ♣ 8 6 5 3 |
|
♠ Q J 9
7 ♥ Q 9 4 ♦ 9 8 4 ♣ A 7 4 |
|
♠
8 6 2 ♥ J 8 6 3
2 ♦ 10 7 5
3 ♣ K |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Svendsen |
Helness |
Thoresen |
Helness |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
|
|
North leads the ♣Q and your ♣K wins. What next? Taking the bidding into
account a diamond shift is far from obvious, but does a heart shift
make sense? If you play a diamond you get 37 m.p. for defeating
1NT. Returning a heart only scores 20 m.p. as it allows the contract
to be made. At our table South played a heart and thus missed the
chance to settle the issue with one board to play. The last board
was no disaster for them either, so they had managed to perform a
very fine double indeed! Congratulations again to
them! |