WEBER FLOODS CAVE
The two round robins in the women’s event will each produce four
qualifiers to contest the quarter finals. In Group B the Round 6
math between Weber’s Anglo/German side and the USA’s Cave was my
pick. Weber was looking to consolidate her position in second place
while Cave was hoping for a big win to get back into contention.
Its surprising how often you can tell from an early stage which
way the wind is blowing and right from the start the German pair
made their intentions clear – aggression at every opportunity.
Board 1. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
♠
K Q J 10 4 3 2 ♥
- ♦ A 10
7 ♣ A 7 5 |
♠ A
7 ♥ A K J 10 8 6 2 ♦ K J ♣ J 8 |
|
♠ 9
6 ♥ 5 3 ♦ Q 9 2 ♣ K 10 9 6 4 3 |
|
♠
8 5 ♥ Q 9 7 4 ♦ 8 6 5 4 3 ♣ Q 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weber |
Sulgrove |
Gromann |
Sprung |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3NT |
4♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
Don’t you get the feeling that after the first three bids the
West hand is of the type favoured by the conductors of bidding
panels? When West selected the aggressive option North decided to
take no risks and rebid her powerful suit. West’s double on the way
out was not automatic, but her partner produced two important cards,
enough to ensure the contract failed by one trick when East led the
two of diamonds.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Henner-Welland |
James |
Radin |
Brock |
|
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
4♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
5♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
Once West had started with a double she felt compelled to
introduce her suit at the five level. South was close to doubling –
as it was the obvious two down meant a 5 IMP pick up for Weber.
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
Q J 8 7 ♥ 3 ♦ Q 7 5 2 ♣ Q 6 5 2 |
♠ 10
4 ♥ Q 6 ♦ A K J 9 4 3 ♣ A 9 4 |
|
♠ K 6
5 ♥ A K 8 7 5 4 2 ♦ 10 ♣ K 8 |
|
♠
A 9 3 2 ♥ J 10 9 ♦ 8 6 ♣ J 10 7 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weber |
Sulgrove |
Gromann |
Sprung |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4NT* |
Pass |
5♥* |
Pass |
5NT* |
Pass |
6♣* |
Pass |
6♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
East’s rebid promised more or less what she had – a stronge rhand
would have been developed differently. With a source of tricks and
two good looking cards on the side, the ]Q and the }A West powered
into the slam. When South led the ace of spades she may have been
worried, but only for a moment, as East was able to claim at trick
three. Declarer would have had to work harder on a passive lead, as
she will need to pick up the diamonds. +980 looked good on paper.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Henner-Welland |
James |
Radin |
Brock |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
|
♦ |
Pass |
3♥ Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
5♥ |
All Pass |
West made a couple of cue bids, but East was not interested,
perhaps taking the view that if all West needed was spade control
she would have bid differently. So, East/West’s piece of paper at
the other table was worth 11 IMPs. Weber continued to gain
steadily and a couple of swings near the end completed an impressive
performance
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
♠
9 8 3 ♥ J 5 4 2 ♦ 4 3 ♣ J 8 3 2 |
♠ A J 10 7
2 ♥ A Q ♦ A J 6 ♣ A Q 7 |
|
♠ 6
5 ♥ K 9 7 ♦ 9 7 5 2 ♣ 9 6 5 4 |
|
♠
K Q 4 ♥ 10 8 6 3 ♦ K Q 10 8 ♣ K 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weber |
Sulgrove |
Gromann |
Sprung |
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Dble |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
With a powerful hand full of tenaces West made a practical
decision that proved to be a winning one. North led the four of
hearts and declarer won with the queen and played the jack of
spades. South won with the king and returned a heart. West won and
exited with a low club to South’s ten. She won the heart return in
dummy, took the spade finesse and cashed her winners, the fall of
the queen of spades and the king of clubs giving her ten tricks and
+430.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Henner-Welland |
James |
Radin |
Brock |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Dble |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
2NT |
All Pass |
|
|
West’s scientific approach was reasonable, but unsuccessful and
Weber had another 7 IMPs. The match finished as it had started,
with an aggressive action by the German pair paying a big
dividend
Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
K Q J 10 7 2 ♥ J 5
2 ♦ 6
5 ♣ A 9 |
♠ 9 8
3 ♥ A K 10 8 3 ♦ J 8 2 ♣ 7 2 |
|
♠
- ♥ Q ♦ K Q 10 9 ♣ Q J 10 8 6 5 4 3 |
|
♠
A 6 5 4 ♥ 9 7 6
4 ♦ A 7 4
3 ♣ K |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Weber |
Sulgrove |
Gromann |
Sprung |
Pass |
2♠ |
5♣ |
5♠ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
Did South bid 5[ in the hope/expectation it might make? That’s
asking a lot facing a weak two bid, even a disciplined one. East led
the queen of diamonds and declarer won, drew trumps, played a club
to the king and a low heart. When West went up with the king
declarer had saved a trick, down one, -100.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Henner-Welland |
James |
Radin |
Brock |
Pass |
1♠ |
4♣ |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
This time it was essential for East/West to be spot on in the
defence, but at the point when declarer led a low heart West went up
with an honour, so that was +420 and 11 IMPs. Weber had won 51-3
IMPs, 25-4 VP and was looking good for one of the four qualification
spots, but Cave was in serious trouble. |