The Semifinals: Hecht v.
Miroglio
by Jos Jacobs
After the excitement all over the quarterfinals, the boards had
quietened down a little at the start of the semis. In the other
match, Orange was playing Özdil, below are some boards from the
Hecht v. Miroglio match, which was in fact a contest between a
Danish and a Polish team. The Danes recorded their first
substantial swing of the match when Kowalski chose the wrong moment
for one more aggressive action:
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
A J 4 ♥ A 10 4 2 ♦ A 5 ♣ 10 8 7 3 |
♠ K Q 9 5
2 ♥ J ♦ K Q 3 ♣ K Q 6 2 |
|
♠
6 ♥ 8 6 5 ♦ 10 9 6 4 2 ♣ A J 5 4 |
|
♠
10 8 7 3 ♥ K Q 9 7
3 ♦ J 8
7 ♣ 9 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kowalski |
L. Blakset |
Tuszynski |
Marquardsen |
|
1NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
As it happened, the Danes were rewarded a game bonus and
something extra for a deal on which they already had missed their
game. Hecht +930.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Hecht |
Romanski |
K. Blakset |
Stepinski |
|
1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2♥ |
Dble |
3♥ |
All Pass |
|
Reaching the game proved not easy at all; it was also missed in
the other semifinal. En tricks were easily made here as well, so
Hecht scored 13 IMPs. A brave action by Romanski brought Miroglio
a lot of IMPs:
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul. |
|
♠
- ♥ A K Q 8 7 6 5
3 ♦ 9 5
3 ♣ J 8 |
♠ A K 10 7
5 ♥ 10 9 ♦ K 7 ♣ Q 9 4 2 |
|
♠ Q 8 6
2 ♥ J 4 2 ♦ 10 2 ♣ A K 10 5 |
|
♠
J 9 4 3 ♥ - ♦ A Q J 8 6 4 ♣ 7 6 3 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kowalski |
L. Blakset |
Tuszynski |
Marquardsen |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Maybe, seeing his partner’s spade shortness, Marquardsen might
have ventured 5♦, but
the idea becomes less attractive in view of his own heart void. A
double, asking for a heart lead no doubt, may be a little
speculative too, and so it turned out. Miroglio +790.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Hecht |
Romanski |
K. Blakset |
Stepinski |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
Dble |
Pass |
5♥ |
All Pass |
|
With the nice diamond fit, Romanski’s courage was well rewarded
when he went down only one for an 12-IMP gain. On the next board,
the Polish NS were the only pair in either semifinal to reach the
proper contract:
Board 11. Dealer South. None Vul.
|
|
♠
K 4 ♥ K Q 10 2 ♦ A K 9 7 ♣ 10 8 2 |
♠ 9
3 ♥ A J 8 7 5 ♦ 8 6 ♣ K 9 7 6 |
|
♠ 10 7 6
2 ♥ 9 3 ♦ 5 4 2 ♣ A Q 5 3 |
|
♠
A Q J 8 5 ♥ 6 4 ♦ Q J 10 3 ♣ J 4 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kowalski |
L. Blakset |
Tuszynski |
Marquardsen |
|
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
5♦ |
All Pass |
|
Declsrer lost his three top tricks for one down. Miroglio
+50.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Hecht |
Romanski |
K. Blakset |
Stepinski |
|
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
This wonderful auction led to a great result for Miroglio: ten
tricks, +420 and 10 more IMPs to them to go back into the
lead. The Strong Club gave the Danish a small chance to reach a
thin vulnerable game on board 13, and they took it too:
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vul.
|
|
♠
9 3 ♥ 6 3 ♦ A 10 8 2 ♣ Q J 6 5 2 |
♠ A 10 7 5
4 ♥ 9 8 ♦ K 7 6 3 ♣ A 8 |
|
♠ 8
6 ♥ K 7 5 4 2 ♦ Q 5 4 ♣ 9 7 4 |
|
♠
K Q J 2 ♥ A Q J
10 ♦ J
9 ♣ K 10
3 |
Open Room: |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Kowalski |
L. Blakset |
Tuszynski |
Marquardsen |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
Nine tricks due to the good diamond intermediates too, Hecht a
fine +600.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Hecht |
Romanski |
K. Blakset |
Stepinski |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
When South had to open 1NT, as in fact they did in the other
semifinal too, the auction was quickly over. Hecht +10 IMPs to catch
up almost the whole deficit: the first half of this 28-board match
ended with the scores almost level at 37-36 to Miroglio. In the
second half, not very much happened. For a long time the scores were
almost level. The Danes scored 8 on board 16, shown below, and the
Polish crept back IMP by IMP over the next ten boards.
Board 16. Dealer West. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
A K 7 5 4 2 ♥ 10 ♦ Q 6 5 ♣ K 7 4 |
♠ J
8 ♥ K J 8 ♦ A K J 8 7 4 2 ♣ J |
|
♠
10 ♥ A 9 4 3 2 ♦ 9 ♣ Q 9 6 5 3 2 |
|
♠
Q 9 6 3 ♥ Q 7 6
5 ♦ 10
3 ♣ A 10 8 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Stepinski |
L. Blakset |
Romanski |
Marquardsen |
1♦ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
3♥ |
4♥ |
4♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
5♦ |
5♥ |
|
|
When the EW hands did not fit as well as Romanski though, and the
trumps proved 4-1 too, he had to go down five, vulnerable, for a
highly unusual score of 500 to Hecht.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Hecht |
Tuszynski |
K. Blakset |
Kowalski |
1♦ |
1♠ |
Dble |
2♠ |
3♦ |
3♠ |
All Pass |
|
On the layout, ten tricks are always there, but the +170 the
Poles scored here were not enough to wipe out the 500 lost in the
Open Room. Hecht +8 IMPs. The match was effectively decided on
the penultimate board, which had been played on Vugraph as the first
board of the set. This meant that the Danish were not feeling happy
as the match progressed, as they knew this board might well ruin
their chances.
Board 27. Dealer South. None Vul.
|
|
♠
A Q 9 8 7 2 ♥ 10 ♦ J 9 ♣ K J 6 3 |
♠ K 10
6 ♥ A ♦ K 10 8 7 5 ♣ 10 9 7 2 |
|
♠ 5
4 ♥ 7 6 4 3 2 ♦ 6 4 3 2 ♣ Q 8 |
|
♠
J 3 ♥ K Q J 9 8
5 ♦ A
Q ♣ A 5
4 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Stepinski |
L. Blakset |
Romanski |
Marquardsen |
|
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All Pass |
|
Talking about slams, 6♥ by South would
have been very playable even against the 5-1 trump break, as the
double spade finesse works. The spade slam had to play at all once
East led a diamond, both establishing a trick in that suit as well
as removing the entry to dummy’s hearts. Down three.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Hecht |
Tuszynski |
K. Blakset |
Kowalski |
|
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
When East led a more speculative: ♣Q,
the play was suddenly easy. Miroglio +420 and an 11-IMP swing,
enough to eventually win the match 64-45. They would face the
Oranges the next day. |