| Grand Prix of Poland`2008 - Finals, round of 48 102: V Vainikonis | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | rozg rywa | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | G Narkiewicz-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 1 | NS | 4![]() | S | A | -1 | -50 | 44.55% | 44.55% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 2 | NS | 6![]() | S | A | -2 | -200 | 17.27% | 30.91% | |||
| 2 | G Narkiewicz-*,K Omernik-W Starkowski | 3 | NS | 4![]() | E | 3 | = | -130 | 27.27% | 29.70% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,K Omernik-W Starkowski | 4 | NS | 1![]() | W | J | -2 | +200 | 100.00% | 47.27% | |||
| 3 | G Narkiewicz-*,D Kowalski-K Araszkiewicz | 5 | NS | 3![]() | E | 3 | -1 | +50 | 50.00% | 47.82% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,D Kowalski-K Araszkiewicz | 6 | NS | 4![]() | S | 8 | +1 | +450 | 77.27% | 52.73% | |||
| 4 | G Narkiewicz-*,P Ilczuk-W Gaweł | 7 | NS | 4![]() | W | 8 | -2 | +200 | 72.73% | 55.58% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,P Ilczuk-W Gaweł | 8 | NS | 3![]() | W | J | -1 | +50 | 68.18% | 57.16% | |||
| 5 | E Miszewska-S Zakrzewski,G Narkiewicz-* | 9 | WE | 3![]() | N | 5 | -1 | +50 | 81.82% | 59.90% | ||
| E Miszewska-S Zakrzewski,G Narkiewicz-* | 10 | WE | 3![]() | E | 4 | +1 | +130 | 50.00% | 58.91% | |||
| 6 | G Narkiewicz-*,P Kucharski-K Kujawa | 11 | NS | 3![]() | E | 4 | +1 | -170 | 81.82% | 60.99% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,P Kucharski-K Kujawa | 12 | NS | 4![]() | E | 3 | +2 | -480 | 18.18% | 57.42% | |||
| 7 | P Łyczkowski-A Serwach,G Narkiewicz-* | 13 | WE | 7![]() | E | 4 | = | +2220 | 63.64% | 57.90% | ||
| P Łyczkowski-A Serwach,G Narkiewicz-* | 14 | WE | 3![]() | W | Q | +1 | +130 | 59.09% | 57.99% | |||
| 8 | G Narkiewicz-*,T Pilch-J Figlus | 15 | NS | 3![]() | N | 10 | +3 | +690 | 40.91% | 56.85% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,T Pilch-J Figlus | 16 | NS | 5 x | N | 2 | = | +550 | 100.00% | 59.55% | |||
| 9 | G Narkiewicz-*,T Winciorek-M Wręczycki | 17 | NS | 6![]() | E | 8 | = | -990 | 59.09% | 59.52% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,T Winciorek-M Wręczycki | 18 | NS | 4![]() | E | A | = | -420 | 13.64% | 56.97% | |||
| 10 | V Zhuravel-A Orlovich,G Narkiewicz-* | 19 | WE | 2![]() | S | A | -1 | +50 | 63.64% | 57.32% | ||
| V Zhuravel-A Orlovich,G Narkiewicz-* | 20 | WE | 4![]() | N | J | +1 | -650 | 59.09% | 57.41% | |||
| 11 | R Szczepański-J Szutowicz,G Narkiewicz-* | 21 | WE | 3 x | W | Q | = | +530 | 100.00% | 59.44% | ||
| R Szczepański-J Szutowicz,G Narkiewicz-* | 22 | WE | 4![]() | N | 6 | -1 | +50 | 36.36% | 58.39% | |||
| 12 | G Narkiewicz-*,K Sikorski-S Henclik | 23 | NS | 3![]() | S | 2 | = | +140 | 81.82% | 59.41% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,K Sikorski-S Henclik | 24 | NS | 2![]() | W | Q | +2 | -170 | 27.27% | 58.07% | |||
| 13 | G Narkiewicz-*,P Tuszyński-A Kowalski | 25 | NS | 3 x | N | 3 | +1 | +630 | 100.00% | 59.75% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,P Tuszyński-A Kowalski | 26 | NS | 3 x | S | Q | -1 | -200 | 27.27% | 58.50% | |||
| 14 | K Kotorowicz-J Kalita,G Narkiewicz-* | 27 | WE | 2![]() | N | 2 | = | -120 | 31.82% | 57.51% | ||
| K Kotorowicz-J Kalita,G Narkiewicz-* | 28 | WE | 2![]() | E | A | +2 | +170 | 68.18% | 57.89% | |||
| 15 | A Czech-M Zieliński,G Narkiewicz-* | 29 | WE | 1![]() | E | 3 | +1 | +120 | 45.45% | 57.46% | ||
| A Czech-M Zieliński,G Narkiewicz-* | 30 | WE | 1![]() | E | A | = | +90 | 22.73% | 56.30% | |||
| 16 | G Narkiewicz-*,S Gołębiowski-W Olański | 1 | NS | 2![]() | S | 4 | +3 | +150 | 86.36% | 57.27% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,S Gołębiowski-W Olański | 2 | NS | 4![]() | E | 5 | -1 | +50 | 72.73% | 57.76% | |||
| 17 | M Rafalski-S Pająk,G Narkiewicz-* | 3 | WE | PASS | 0 | 90.91% | 58.76% | |||||
| M Rafalski-S Pająk,G Narkiewicz-* | 4 | WE | 4![]() | N | 4 | -1 | +100 | 77.27% | 59.30% | |||
| 18 | G Narkiewicz-*,D Filipowicz-P Jurek | 5 | NS | 3![]() | N | Q | = | +600 | 72.73% | 59.69% | ||
| G Narkiewicz-*,D Filipowicz-P Jurek | 6 | NS | 3![]() | N | A | -1 | -50 | 50.00% | 59.42% | |||
| 19 | G Brewiak-W Żarowski,G Narkiewicz-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | = | +620 | 68.18% | 59.66% | ||
| G Brewiak-W Żarowski,G Narkiewicz-* | 8 | WE | 3 x | E | 5 | = | +470 | 100.00% | 60.72% | |||
| 20 | W Dolny-J Michałowski,G Narkiewicz-* | 9 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | = | -400 | 18.18% | 59.63% | ||
| W Dolny-J Michałowski,G Narkiewicz-* | 10 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | = | +620 | 81.82% | 60.18% | |||
| 21 | B Szulejewski-M Bartkowski,G Narkiewicz-* | 11 | WE | 5![]() | S | 3 | = | -400 | 27.27% | 59.38% | ||
| B Szulejewski-M Bartkowski,G Narkiewicz-* | 12 | WE | 4![]() | E | 8 | +2 | +480 | 63.64% | 59.48% | |||
| 22 | R Jagniewski-M Kwiecień,G Narkiewicz-* | 13 | WE | 4![]() | S | J | -1 | +100 | 90.91% | 60.21% | ||
| R Jagniewski-M Kwiecień,G Narkiewicz-* | 14 | WE | 4![]() | N | A | +1 | -450 | 31.82% | 59.57% | |||
| 23 | P Janiszewski-L Sztyrak,G Narkiewicz-* | 15 | WE | 6![]() | E | 3 | = | +980 | 100.00% | 60.46% | ||
| P Janiszewski-L Sztyrak,G Narkiewicz-* | 16 | WE | 5![]() | S | A | = | -400 | 27.27% | 59.74% | |||
| SUMA: | 59.74% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 45.49% | |||||||||||
| +/-: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 52.62% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 30 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.0.0.30 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2008-12-22 o 22:44:17