| ||||||||||||||||
ROUND 2, TABLE 24 | ||||||||||||||||
21. STAMFORD BRIDGE | VS | 28. AGRESSOR | ||||||||||||||
OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||||
NS: | NS: | |||||||||||||||
EW: | EW: | |||||||||||||||
contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||||
NS EW | NS EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |||||||||||
2![]() | E | ![]() | = | -110 | 9 | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | 110 | 6 | |||||
4![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | 680 | 10 | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | 680 | – | – | ||||
4![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | 480 | 11 | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | 450 | 1 | |||||
2![]() | E | ![]() | = | -110 | 12 | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | 50 | 4 | |||||
2![]() | S | ![]() | = | 110 | 13 | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | 110 | – | – | ||||
3![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | 100 | 14 | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | -140 | 6 | |||||
3![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | 50 | 15 | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | 100 | 2 | |||||
3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -630 | 16 | 2![]() | W | ![]() | +2 | -170 | 10 | |||||
IMP: | 7 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
RESULT: | 3 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 |