USA II vs Poland
It has been many years since a woman participated in the Bermuda
Bowl, and no one can remember a woman ever getting to the semifinal
round of the event. Rose Meltzer of USA II, therefore, is breaking
new ground - and making the most of her opportunity. As play began
for the third semifinal session of the Bermuda Bowl, USA II led the
favored Polish team 63-61.
The Americans wasted no time adding to their margin - and it
could have been more.
Board 1. Dealer North. None Vul.
|
|
ª K Q 10 6 2 © A 10 8 3 2 ¨ 10 § 8 5 |
ª 9 8 3 © 9 ¨ 9 7 § K Q 7 6 4 3 2 |
|
ª A 7 4 © Q 6 5 4 ¨ A K 8 § A J 9 |
|
ª J 5 © K J 7 ¨ Q J 6 5 4 3 2 § 10 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
1ª |
Dble |
2¨ |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Perhaps Adam Zmudzinski was counting on clubs breaking badly for
declarer, considering his singleton. The double worked out badly,
however - Kyle Larsen had 10 tricks and soon was scoring up plus
650. The auction at the other table was vastly different - and
declarer landed in a contract that could have been defeated.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
Pass |
1§
(1) |
3¨ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
5§ |
All Pass. |
|
|
(1) Polish club: possibly strong.
Lew Stansby started off with the ¨Q, taken by Marcin Lesniewski in hand. He cashed
the §A and played the §9 to dummy's king, followed by
dummy's singleton heart. Chip Martel could have sunk the contract by
playing low, but he played the ©A and switched to the ªK. Lesnieswki ducked and won the spade
continuation. He ruffed a heart, returned to hand with the §J and played a third round of
hearts. When the king appeared, Lesniewski ruffed and claimed for
plus 400 (discarding the losing spade in dummy on the good ©Q). It was a 6-IMP loss, but it
could have been 12.
Both pairs got too high on the following deal - and both went
down, although it looked in the open room as though Lesniewski was
going to get it right.
Board 4. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª Q 5 4 3 © 5 ¨ Q 8 6 5 2 § A J 6 |
ª K © A 10 7 ¨ A K 7 4 § K Q 8 5 4 |
|
ª A J 8 6 © K 9 8 6 2 ¨ 9 § 10 9 7 |
|
ª 10 9 7 2 © Q J 4 3 ¨ J 10 3 § 3
2 |
East played 5© at both
tables after 1§ openings by
West. Meltzer's 1§ opening
was natural, Krzysztof Martens' was the Polish Club. Eventually,
both West's got around to Blackwood, officially getting the
partnership too high.
Full details of the play in the closed room were unavailable, but
Larsen finished down one for minus 100.
On Vugraph, Lesniewski had a chance to make the contract, but it
didn't work out. Stansby started with the ¨J, taken by the ace. Lesniewski then ruffed a
diamond and led a club to the king. Martel ducked smoothly, and
Lesniewski cashed the ¨K,
pitching a club, and exited dummy with a low club. Martel won the
§J, thought about his play
for awhile, and continued with the ¨Q. Lesniewski ruffed with the ©9, and the Vugraph analysts
predicted that the defense would prevail if Stansby declined to
overruff. Stansby did ruff with the queen, and now Lesniewski could
make it by taking the right view in hearts. He played a heart to the
king and another to the ace, however, and was down one.
The following deal featured a torturous auction that landed
Lesniewski-Martens in the wrong spot, but the opening lead rescued
declarer.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
|
|
ª 10 5 © A 9 8 6 5 4 2 ¨ 5 § 10 8 5 |
ª A Q © J 10 7 ¨ A K J 7 6 § 6 3 2 |
|
ª 9 7 © K ¨ Q 10 9 8 4 3 § A J 7 4 |
|
ª K J 8 6 4 3 2 © Q 3 ¨ 2 § K Q 9 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
|
1ª |
1NT |
2© |
3NT |
All Pass |
Larsen's 3NT bid was a bold stroke - and it worked like a charm,
especially when Cezary Balicki led the ©5 to the king, and Zmudzinski unblocked the
queen. All of a sudden, Meltzer had 11 tricks and plus 660. At the
other table, the auction took its toll on East and West.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
|
|
1ª |
1NT |
2© |
3© |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
Redbl |
Pass |
3ª |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
Neither Pole would own up to having a heart stopper, although the
two hands combined could stop the suit once. Martens' 3ª bid seemed to be offering
Lesniewski one last chance to bid 3NT, but he just couldn't do it
with a singleton king. After a protracted huddle during which he
appeared to be undergoing the tortures of the damned, Lesniewski
finally bid the diamond game. The next question was whether Stansby
could avoid the led of the ©Q, which would give the game away. On the
auction, it seemed impossible that he would lead anything else, and
in fact that is what he led. After all that, Lesniewski used the
heart suit - of all things - to discard two of his losing clubs.
Eleven tricks made for plus 600 and a loss of 2 IMPs.
The Americans picked up 11 IMPs on this deal because of a warning
from a Polish auction.
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª A K J © K Q 7 2 ¨ A 8 5 § J 8 4 |
ª Q 9 8 2 © 10 9 ¨ K 10 9 6 2 § A 5 |
|
ª 10 5 © A J 8 4 3 ¨ Q 7 4 3 § 7 6 |
|
ª 7 6 4 3 © 6 5 ¨ J § K Q 10 9 3 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1¨ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
One Club was Polish and the 1NT rebid showed a balanced hand of
18 or more high-card points.
Larsen didn't fancy leading a heart on the auction, so he found
the killing diamond lead. From there, declarer could do no better
than two down for minus 100. It wasn't as clear in the open room
that a heart lead might be dangerous.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
Dble |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Lesniewski knew Martel had heart values but it didn't have to be
four of them, so he made the normal-looking lead of a low heart.
Martel won and played a club to dummy's king, which was ducked.
Martens could not hold up a second time, and when he was in with the
§A, he switched futilely to
the ¨K. Martel won and cashed
his club winners. Martens discarded down to the doubleton ªQ, so Martel ended up with an
overtrick. That was an 11-IMP gain for USA II.
On the following deal, the Americans' best opportunity for a big
gain slipped through their fingers and turned into a significant
loss.
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vul.
|
|
ª 9 7 © J 5 ¨ A Q J 8 5 4 § J 6 2 |
ª Q 5 4 3 © K 4 2 ¨ 10 § A 8 7 5 3 |
|
ª A K J 10 2 © A 7 ¨ K 9 7 6 2 § Q |
|
ª 8 6 © Q 10 9 8 6 3 ¨ 3 § K 10 9 4 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Dble |
4© |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
|
Stansby led the ¨3 to the
ace, and Martel switched to a low spade. Lesniewski won the ace and
cashed the king. He was then able to establish a long club in dummy
via ruffs and claim 12 tricks.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5§ |
Pass |
6ª |
All Pass |
The Americans got to the good slam but didn't make it. Zmudzinski
led his singleton diamond to the ace, and Balicky switched to a
trump. Larsen won in hand and, possibly planning a crossruff, played
his §Q to the ace and ruffed
a club. When he attempted to cash the ¨K, which he would do in trying the crossruff,
Zmudzinski ruffed. That was a winner Larsen needed for his slam, and
although Larsen could overruff in dummy, he finished a trick short
for one down. Instead of winning 13 IMPs for the slam swing, the
team lost 13.
Both pairs reached slam on the following deal, but Lesniewski had
to sweat more to make his.
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
ª J 4 © 10 5 4 ¨ 8 2 § K J 10 8 6 2 |
ª A 10 8 7 5 © K 7 2 ¨ A K Q 10 § 4 |
|
ª Q © A J 9 8 6 ¨ 9 7 6 5 § A Q 9 |
|
ª K 9 6 3 2 © Q 3 ¨ J 4 3 § 7 5 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Meltzer |
Balicky |
Larsen |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
6© |
All Pass |
|
|
The club lead from South made Larsen's job relatively easy once
the reasonable splits in the red suits came to light. He needed only
to ruff one club in dummy to claim his slam - plus 980 for USA
II.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Martel |
Lesniewski |
Stansby |
|
|
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5© |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
Stansby started with a low spade, and Lesniewski won in dummy,
cashing two high diamonds, followed by a heart to his jack. Stansby
won the queen and got out with his ¨J. Lesniewski, without the resources for two
club ruffs - he couldn't afford to ruff with one of dummy's face
cards, anyway, unless the heart finesse worked - had no choice but
to take the club finesse. When it held, he could breath more easily
with plus 920. It was still a 2-IMP loss, but it would have been 14
if the club finesse had been wrong.
Both teams were assessed late penalties of 2
IMPs, and the final net score of the set was 21-11 in favor of USA
II, still with high hopes of a Bermuda Bowl
upset. |