35th World Interzonal Team Championships, Paris, France Friday, 2 November 2001

Norway vs USA II

Bermuda Bowl Final 1

The Bermuda Bowl final is shorter than usual this year, consisting of 128 boards in eight 16-board segments, instead of 160, allowing a less exhausting schedule. Just as well if the deals are all going to be as lively as the first set on Thursday afternoon.

Board 1. Dealer North. None Vul.
  ª 8 3
© A 5
¨ 7 6 5 3
§ Q 10 5 4 3
ª K Q 5
© Q J 8 3 2
¨ 10 8
§ J 9 7
Bridge deal ª 7 4
© 10 6 4
¨ A K Q 9
§ A K 8 6
  ª A J 10 9 6 2
© K 9 7
¨ J 4 2
§ 2

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
  Pass 1NT 2¨
Dble 2© Pass 2ª
3© Pass 4© All Pass

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
  Pass 1NT 2ª
2NT Pass 3§ Pass
3NT All Pass    

Lew Stansby's 2¨ overcall showed one major and Geir Helgemo doubled then bid his hearts, suggesting an at least semi-balanced hand with five hearts. Of course, Tor Helness raised to the heart game rather than explore the possibility of playing 3NT. Chip Martel led the eight of spades to the ace and Stansby switched to his singleton club. There is a winning line from here but it is not a very likely one, namely to play four rounds of diamonds to throw clubs from hand. South has to ruff the fourth diamond to prevent the second discard but no longer has the third trump with which to ruff a club. Anyway, that was all academic as Helgemo followed the simple line of playing the §J to the queen and ace then leading a trump. Martel won his ace and led a club to the king, ruffed - down one for -50.

Rose Meltzer did very well at the other table. When South overcalls 2ª, West has to decide whether to show the hearts or just settle for no trump. Perhaps a good compromise would be to use a Lebensohl sequence to show four hearts plus a spade stopper? Anyway, Meltzer ignored the hearts completely, showing a balanced game raise with a spade stopper. Boye Brogeland's low diamond lead did no exactly paralyse declarer. Kyle Larsen won and played a heart to the queen and ace and Erik Saelensminde returned a diamond. Larsen had time for an overtrick now; +430 and 10 IMPs to USA2.

Board 4. Dealer West. All Vul.
  ª J 10 9 6 3 2
© A
¨ A 6 5 3
§ 10 3
ª 7
© K 9 4 3 2
¨ Q 2
§ K Q 8 5 2
Bridge deal ª A K 8
© J 10 7 6 5
¨ K J 4
§ 9 6
  ª Q 5 4
© Q 8
¨ 10 9 8 7
§ A J 7 4

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
Pass 2ª Pass 3ª
All Pass      

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
Pass 1ª Pass 2ª
Pass 3ª All Pass  

East/West are on the heart position for 4© and, in the normal course of events, are likely to get that decision right. Neither East/West pair managed to get into the auction in this match. Martel opened a weak two and received a pre-emptive raise from Stansby, shutting out Helgemo, who would no doubt have come in had 2ª been passed around to him. The North hand was way too good for a weak two in the style of this Norwegian partnership and Saelensminde opened at the one level. When Brogeland gave a single raise, Saelensminde reraised himself as a pre-emptive measure and he too bought the contract in 3ª.

There was little to the play. Larsen led the jack of hearts, Helness the nine of clubs, and both declarers failed by a trick for -100 and a push board.

Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul.
  ª J 10 8 7 5
© K 9 5
¨ K 9
§ A 8 4
ª K 4 2
© J 8 7 6 3
¨ Q 7 6 5
§ 5
Bridge deal ª Q 3
© Q 10 2
¨ A J 8 2
§ Q 9 7 2
  ª A 9 6
© A 4
¨ 10 4 3
§ K J 10 6 3

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
  Pass Pass 1§
Pass 1ª All Pass  

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
  1ª Pass 2§
Pass 2NT Pass 3ª
Pass 4ª All Pass  

Would you open the North hand? A matter of personal style and I personally would pass at this vulnerability, but I have no problem with the more aggressive style. Here, passing worked out very badly for Martel as Stansby opened 1§ then passed the 1ª response and game was missed. This was particularly unlucky for the Americans as at a different vulnerability Stansby would have been playing a weak no trump opening and now Martel would have been able to transfer then follow an invitational sequence which would probably have reached game - the South hand is no longer a minimum once partner has shown spades. Helness led his low trump against 1ª and Martel ran that to the king. Helgemo switched to the singleton club and now it looks as though there are eleven tricks available, though Martel was only credited with ten; +170.

Meanwhile, Saelensminde did open the North hand, as one might expect of this partnership, and the Norwegians were always getting to game. Larsen led a heart and Saelensminde won in hand and ran the seven of spades. Meltzer too switched to the club and declarer made eleven tricks for +650 and 10 IMPs to Norway.

Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul.
  ª A J 8 3
© 10 4 3 2
¨ 8 3
§ 9 4 3
ª K Q 6 4 2
© J 8
¨ K J 5 2
§ A 5
Bridge deal ª 10
© K 9 7 5
¨ A 9 7 6
§ K J 8 6
  ª 9 7 5
© A Q 6
¨ Q 10 4
§ Q 10 7 2

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
    Pass Pass
1ª Pass 1NT Pass
2¨ Pass 3¨ All Pass

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
    Pass Pass
1ª Pass 1NT Pass
2¨ Pass 2NT Pass
3NT All Pass    


Larsen Chris, USA
 

Helness's 1Nt response was not forcing, so he could assume that 2¨ would deliver four cards. That makes his 3¨ raise slightly cautious, but nothing is perfect on the hand. Martel led the eight of diamonds, suit preference (?), to the nine, queen and king. Helgemo played the ªQ from hand and Martel won and led a second trump to the ten and jack. Helgemo ruffed a spade, played king then ace of clubs, and ruffed another spade with the ace of diamonds. He could ruff a club to hand, draw the four of trumps with his five, and cash two spades; +130.

Meltzer's 2¨ rebid could have been based on a three-card suit as 1NT was forcing. That made 2NT the least bad option available to Larsen and Meltzer went on to game. Larsen received a favourable start when Brogeland led a low club round to the jack. The diamond finesse won and now Larsen passed the ©J to the queen. He was close to making now but the defensive spade spots proved to be just too strong for him.

Brogeland switched to a spade, which Larsen ran towards his ten, losing to the jack. Back came a low spade to the nine and king and now Larsen played for his legitimate chance by leading to the king of hearts rather than running the eight. That meant an extra one down as he now lost three spades and three hearts; -200 and 8 IMPs to Norway.

Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul.
  ª 9 8 7 6 4 2
© 3
¨ A 9 6
§ A K 8
ª 10
© J 9 8 5 4 2
¨ Q 10 7 3
§ 4 3
Bridge deal ª A K Q J 5
© K 7 6
¨ 8 4
§ J 9 6
  ª 3
© A Q 10
¨ K J 5 2
§ Q 10 7 5 2

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
      1§
Pass 1ª Pass 2§
Pass 2¨ Pass 2NT
Pass 3NT Dble Pass
Pass Rdbl Pass 4§
Pass 5§ All Pass  

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
      1§
Pass 1ª Pass 2§
Pass 2¨ Pass 2NT
Pass 3ª Pass 3NT
All Pass      

The Norwegian North/South pair had a free run to 3NT and Saelensminde's 3ª bid no doubt dissuaded Larsen from trying a double of the final contract. Meltzer led a heart to the king and ace and Brogeland ran the clubs. He saw Larsen throw a spade then a heart, and Meltzer two hearts and a diamond. With nine top tricks at this point, Brogeland elected to back his judgement that the ¨Q was on his right. He played ace of diamonds then a diamond to the jack and was left looking very foolish when Meltzer won the queen and switched to the ten of spades - one down for -100. It is fair to say that Brogeland would still have been OK had the remaining spades not been 4-1.

With spades only having been bid once on his right, Helness decided to double 3NT at the other table. When that got back to Martel he knew what the problem was and, after some thought, judged to make a doubt-showing redouble. Had the ª10 and ª5 been switched, this would have been absolutely correct, of course. Stansby had nowhere very nice to run to but assumed that Martel would have some clubs to be able to suggest removing 3NT doubled. Stansby removed to 4§ and Martel raised to game.

There is quite a lot to the play of 5§. The contract is an easy make looking at all four hands, but by no means cold in real life. Helgemo led his spade and Helness allowed the ten to hold the trick. Not wishing to open up either red suit, Helgemo switched to a trump for the eight, jack and queen. Stansby wanted to take the heart finesse and the convenient way to cross to dummy was in diamonds. He played a diamond to the ace then a heart to the queen, cashed the ace of hearts and ruffed the ten. Now a diamond to the jack lost to the queen and he was down one; -100 and a flat board.

Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul.
  ª Q
© Q 8 6 5 3
¨ Q 8 4 3
§ K 9 7
ª A K 10 8 3
© J 9 4
¨ 7 5
§ J 8 5
Bridge deal ª 9 7 5 4
© A 10 7
¨ J 10 2
§ Q 10 3
  ª J 6 2
© K 2
¨ A K 9 6
§ A 6 4 2

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
    Pass 1§
1ª Dble 2ª Dble
Pass 3© All Pass  

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
    Pass 1NT
Pass 2¨ Pass 2©
Pass 3NT All Pass  

Game is dreadful on the North'South cards and Stansby/Martel duly stopped off in a heart partscore, albeit at an unsafe level. Helness led a spade to Helgemo's king and the switch was to the jack of hearts. That ran to the king and Martel returned a heart to the ten. Helness played a spade, on which Martel pitched his losing club, but that only delayed the inevitable, as he had to ruff the next spade. Playing a heart no would make the contract when the suit broke evenly, but would cost three down if hearts were 4-2. Meanwhile, playing on the side suits would be a safe one down. Martel thought for a long time but eventually set about the diamonds and the defence could make their trumps separately; down one for -100.

Saelensminde took an aggressive view over Brogeland's 15-17 no trump and the bad game was reached. Meltzer led the ª8 and dummy's queen scored. It all looked pretty hopeless for Brogeland but he had to make the best of it. He led a heart to the king then a second heart for the nine, queen and ace. Larsen clearly read the ª8 as being from a weak holding because he switched to a club for the jack and king. Brogeland played a third round of hearts, pitching a diamond, and Meltzer won the jack. She cashed a top spade but obviously didn't like what she saw because she now switched back to clubs and Brogeland could win and cash out for plus one; a staggering +630 to Norway and 12 IMPs.

Board 12. Dealer West. N/S Vul.
  ª 9 5 3
© J 8 5 3
¨ K
§ A K Q 10 4
ª K Q 10
© K 7 6 2
¨ 6 4
§ 8 7 5 2
Bridge deal ª A 8 2
© 9 4
¨ A 9 8 7 3
§ J 9 3
  ª J 7 6 4
© A Q 10
¨ Q J 10 5 2
§ 6

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
Pass 1§ 1¨ Pass
Pass Dble All Pass  

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
Pass 1§ 1¨ 1ª
1NT Pass Pass Dble
Pass Pass 2¨ Dble
All Pass      

What is it about that East hand that makes it so tempting to make an overcall in a suit that offers no pre-emptive effect and which you do not particularly want to see partner lead? Both Easts overcalled 1¨ but the two Souths took different courses. Stansby passed then passed again when Martel made a reopening double. Stansby led his club and Martel won and played three more rounds of the suit. Stansby threw two spades away but when Helness ruffed the fourth club with the nine of diamonds he over-ruffed and switched to the queen of hearts. Helness didn't like that very much but went up with the king and played a diamond to the ace and a diamond back. The third round of hearts forced declarer so that Stansby made his five of diamonds for down two; -300.

Brogeland did not initially play for a penalty, preferring to show his spades. Meltzer competed with 1Nt and when that came back to Brogeland he doubled. I am not at all convinced by Larsen's decision to rescue his partner by running to that empty diamond suit but that is what he did and it cost his side 5 IMPs. One No Trump doubled would surely have made five tricks - three spades, a diamond and a heart - for a flat board, but 2¨ had to go for -500. The first four tricks were as in the other room, but here Brogeland switched to a spade rather than a heart. It mattered not a she eventually came to a spade ruff so made four of his trumps, just as had Stansby.

Board 13. Dealer North. All Vul.
  ª A 9 7
© A K J 9 6 2
¨ J 9 7 2
§ -
ª K J 10 5
© 8 4
¨ 8
§ A Q J 9 6 4
Bridge deal ª Q 8 4
© Q 7
¨ A K 5 4
§ 10 8 5 2
  ª 6 3 2
© 10 5 3
¨ Q 10 6 3
§ K 7 3

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
  1© Pass 1NT
2§ 2© 3© Pass
3ª Pass 4§ All Pass

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
  1© Pass 1NT
2§ 3© 4§ Pass
4ª All Pass    

Four Clubs was not a problem, Helgemo simply relying on the trump finesse for his contract after Martel had cashed two top hearts and switched to a diamond; +130. Four Spades was a lot more interesting. Saelensminde led three rounds of hearts and Meltzer took the force in dummy. She played a trump and Saelensminde won immediately to play a fourth heart, again ruffed in dummy. Meltzer took the club finesse now in an attempt to get to hand to draw the trumps, but the ruff meant that she was down one; -100 and 6 IMPs to Norway.

Declarer has a problem with entries on this forcing defence and as the cards lie cannot make the contract. The alternative line is to take the first force in the long hand. Now, the defence must duck two rounds of trumps and declarer cannot lead a third round as she is then wide open in hearts. Eventually, the two defensive trumps are made separately for the same down one.

Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
  ª K 10 7 5 2
© 3
¨ Q 9 5
§ Q 8 4 3
ª A
© A K J 10 4 2
¨ A K 6
§ A 9 7
Bridge deal ª J 9 6 4 3
© 9 6
¨ 10 8 3 2
§ 10 6
  ª Q 8
© Q 8 7 5
¨ J 7 4
§ K J 5 2

West North East South
Helgemo Martel Helness Stansby
    Pass Pass
2§ Pass 2¨ Pass
2© Pass 3§ Pass
3¨ Pass 4¨ Pass
4© All Pass    

West North East South
Meltzer Saelensminde Larsen Brogeland
    Pass Pass
2§ Pass 2¨ Pass
2© Pass 2ª Pass
3© Pass 3ª Pass
4§ Pass 4© Pass
6© All Pass    

Both Wests opened with their system big bids and both collected a negative response from partner. Helgemo's 2© rebid was natural and Helness made a second negative. Thinking that 3NT might be easier than 4© if Helness could bid spades, Helgemo temporised with 3¨. The actual diamond raise was not what Helgemo was hoping for and he went back to the heart game. Helgemo won the spade lead and played ace and another club to establish his ruff. He ruffed the spade return and took his club ruff then passed the ©9. The 4-1 trump break meant a loser in that suit but still +420.

Meltzer's 2© rebid was two way, either natural or strong and balanced. Two Spades was a relay and 3© confirmed a one-suited heart type. Now it looks as though Meltzer read her partner's 3ª bid as a cuebid for hearts, given that she had shown a one-suiter that would presumably always do as a trump suit. That would explain why she went on to slam in the face of Larsen's sign off. Six Hearts was way too high, of course, and Meltzer was down two for -100 and 11 IMPs to Norway.

USA2 picked up 9 IMPs on Board 16 because they were doubled in 4ª, making an overtrick, against 4ª undoubled making at the other table. And on Board 16 their North/South pair stopped in 3©+1 against Norway's 4©-1 for another 6 IMPs. Alas, bidding and play records were not available for these two deals.

All that meant that Norway ended the set in the lead by 47-35 IMPs.


Page 4

 
Previous Page Next Page
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5