Israel vs Poland
Open Round 34
The first match on VuGraph, Friday morning, was the Israel v.
Poland encounter. Israel were out of contention for the top five
spot, except if a number of miracles would occur, and Poland were in
5th position, 16 V.P. ahead of Sweden and thus by no means safely
booked for Bali. As both teams had been doing well during these
weeks, another good match was in sight and so it proved.
After five boards, Poland led 5-0 on overtricks but then Israel
struck in a peculiar way:
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª K 2 © A K 7 6 4 ¨ A J 7 5 4 3 § - |
ª Q 3 © Q J 3 ¨ K 8 6 § K Q 8 5 3 |
|
ª A 10 9 7 5 4 © 10 9 5 2 ¨ - § 10 9 7 |
|
ª J 8 6 © 8 ¨ Q 10 9 2 § A J 6 4 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
2NT |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4© |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
As 2NT showed the two lower of the remaining suits, 4©, a forward-going move for sure,
might well have become the final contract. There is much to say for
a direct jump to 6¨ over
4¨, but in the end the
Israelis landed on their feet for a fine +920.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
1© |
2ª |
Pass |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
In the Closed Room, Balicki was lucky to at all get a second
chance of showing a suit. As Zmudzinski could not possibly be aware
of partner's exact distribution, slam was out of the question for
him. Poland thus only mustered +420 and lost 11 IMPs.
§¨©ª
In the Romania v. Liechenstein match, one North also decided to
overcall 1©. When East felt
he did not have enough points to introduce his spades, North played
there and just made 7 tricks…
ª©¨§
The next board saw Poland come back to 8-11 on an extra
undertrick but then, three consecutive boards swung the match
Israel's way:
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul.
|
|
ª 7 5 © A K 6 3 ¨ Q 10 5 2 § K 4 3 |
ª K J 8 3 © 9 4 2 ¨ A 8 3 § J 10 8 |
|
ª A Q 10 2 © Q J 8 ¨ 9 7 § A Q 9 5 |
|
ª 9 6 4 © 10 7 5 ¨ K J 6 4 § 7 6 2 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
Pass |
1¨ |
Dble |
2¨ |
2ª |
3¨ |
3ª |
All Pass |
Sensible non-vulnerable bidding with both East and West holding a
little in reserve. Poland +170. Please note the daring 3¨ by Kalish. This might have gone
three off had someone doubled it, but as it was, it changed the
meaning of 3ª from
invitational into more competitive.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
Pass |
1§ |
Dble |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
With the §K well-placed,
as could be expected from North's opening bid, and with all the club
intermediates present, this contract was no problem at all and in
fact better than 4ª as the
latter might go down on a heart ruff had the layout been different.
The Polish Club did not work well here, as Zmudzinski could not
compete like his Israeli counterpart did as South. Israel +400 and 6
IMPs.
Board 9. Dealer North. E/W Vul.
|
|
ª J 8 7 4 3 2 © 8 4 ¨ A § K 4 3 2 |
ª A 5 © K 10 6 2 ¨ Q J 10 6 4 § A 10 |
|
ª Q 10 9 6 © A Q 7 5 3 ¨ 9 5 3 § 5 |
|
ª K © J 9 ¨ K 8 7 2 § Q J 9 8 7 6 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
2¨ |
Pass |
2ª |
Dble |
Pass |
4© |
All Pass |
As the club fit never came to light after the spade Multi, the
Poles were allowed to play an undisturbed 4© for +650.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
Pass |
Pass |
2§ |
2¨ |
4ª |
Dble |
All Pass |
Here, North did not open his unpromising spade suit, so
Zmudzinski opened a natural 2§. When West overcalled 2¨ only and Balicki introduced his spades, the
VuGraph audience thought this should imply a club fit as North had
not opened. When North surprisingly passed, the Poles lost 800 and 4
IMPs instead of going down only 300 for an 8-IMP gain. Israel 21-8
up now.
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul.
|
|
ª 7 5 © K 10 9 5 4 ¨ 8 6 5 § K 5 3 |
ª K 9 © A 6 ¨ A K 7 2 § A J 10 7 2 |
|
ª Q J 10 6 2 © Q J 7 ¨ Q 10 9 4 § Q |
|
ª A 8 4 3 © 8 3 2 ¨ J 3 § 9 8 6 4 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2§ |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Holding only queens and jacks, Lesniewski could not find any good
forward-going bid popposite his partner's minor suit reverse. He
might have been well off in settling for 3NT, as 6¨ by East will go down on a heart lead, and
probably on many other leads as well. Poland +660.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1§ |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
2¨ |
Pass |
3¨ |
Pass |
3© |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4§ |
Pass |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
Pass |
5¨ |
Pass |
6¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
The Israeli natural auction placed the declaration in the West
hand. North now had to lead, and had he selected a trump the
contract might still have gone down. As EW had not clearly shown
their heart control, Balicki led the ©10 which immediately paved the way to 12
tricks: four spades, two hearts, five diamonds and the §A. In view of the auction a lucky,
but also a deserved swing to Israel who increased their lead to
33-8.
The Poles hit back with a successful partscore on both tables to
score 6 IMPs, but then the Israelis showed good defence:
Board 14. Dealer East. None Vul.
|
|
ª A K 6 © Q J 8 ¨ 10 7 6 3 § 7 6 3 |
ª J 2 © K 10 7 6 5 4 3 ¨ 9 2 § A J |
|
ª 10 9 8 © A 9 2 ¨ 8 4 § K Q 5 4 2 |
|
ª Q 7 5 4 3 © - ¨ A K Q J 5 § 10 9 8 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
|
|
Pass |
1© |
2© |
2ª |
Dble |
3© |
Pass |
3ª |
All Pass |
|
On a trump lead, Kalish made ten tricks in peace, Israel
+170.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
|
|
Pass |
1ª |
3© |
3ª |
4§ |
4¨ |
Pass |
4ª |
All Pass |
|
With the hearts 3-0, a club lead is vital to give the
defence any chance at all. Michael Barel did find the §A lead and continued the
suit. For Aviram is was then easy to see that the ªJ or better with his partner
would defeat the contract, so he played the 4th round of
clubs, which West duly ruffed with the jack. Well done, one
down, Israel +50 and 6 IMPs more: 39-14 now.
This is where it still stood when the last board nearly
halved the Israeli advantage: |
|
BAREL Michael,
Israel |
Board 20. Dealer West. All Vul.
|
|
ª A © Q ¨ 10 9 7 6 2 § Q 10 8 6 5 2 |
ª K 5 2 © 8 7 6 5 2 ¨ K § K 9 7 4 |
|
ª Q 10 9 4 © A 10 3 ¨ J 8 4 3 § J 3 |
|
ª J 8 7 6 3 © K J 9 4 ¨ A Q 5 § A |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Martens |
Kalish |
Lesniewski |
Podgur |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
5¨ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
A wild 2NT for minors opening in 2nd position, vulnerable, by
North led to a bold jump to game by South. Nobody was nasty enough
to double this so the costs were only 400.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Barel |
Balicki |
Aviram |
Zmudzinski |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
3§ |
All Pass |
|
A quiet natural auction brought the Poles in a more sensible
contract which was made when Balicki correctly played the §Q from hand at the second round of
trumps, felling the jack. Poland another +110 and 11 IMPs.
The final score: 39-27 to Israel, 17-13 V.P.
Poland had lost, but their chances of qualifying were not yet really
in danger. |