A Day in the Life
By Herman De Wael
As part of my functions of Scribe of the Appeals Committee, I
calculate the relative frequency of appeals during European
Championships, and express this as the "BAR" (Board Appeal Ratio).
At these championships, the BAR is currently at a relatively low
value of 0.26 appeals per 1000 boards. I will let you know the final
figure in tomorrow's bulletin.
In order to calculate the BAR, I need to count the total number
of boards played at the championships, and I do this meticulously by
checking the number of players in every session, especially here,
where the heat means that nearly every time, some pairs have dropped
out. That is what I call "checking the holes", and now I know how
many holes it takes to fill the Palais de l'Europe.
On Wednesday evening, I just had to laugh when the figure had
reached the high 90,000's, and I calculated that we would reach the
sixth digit sometime Thursday morning. After checking Thursday's
holes, I calculated that the 105th table to play the seventh board
of the first session would be the special one. Of course it is
impossible to find which one of 256 tables in 10 rooms in 3
buildings is the 105th to start play, so I decided to simply use the
105th table, starting from A1, as the special one. That turned out
to be K4.
So let me introduce to you: the 100,000th board of these
Championships.
Board 13. Dealer North. All Vulnerable. |
|
ª A 7 © K 10 9 ¨ Q 9 7 6 5 3 2 § Q |
ª
K J 2 © 6 5 4
2 ¨ - § K 10 9 4 3 2 |
|
ª
Q 10 6 3 © A
Q J ¨ A K 10
8 § J 7 |
|
ª 9 8 5 4 © 8 7 3 ¨ J 4 § A 8 6 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Salomone |
Bruhn |
Bertello |
Eriksen |
|
1¨ |
Dble |
Pass |
2© |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3§ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Asger Bruhn opened hostilities with 1¨ and Renato Bertello was unstoppable. Giovanni
Salomone introduced both his suits and was rather sad ("what do I
bid when I am negative?") when he put his dummy down. Christian
Eriksen did pick his partner's long suit by leading the ¨J, but Renato made the grade when
he was able to set up the clubs for 10 tricks.
Tiger Bridge
By Mark Horton
Some of you may be lucky enough to have a copy of Tiger Bridge by
Jeremy Flint & Freddie North. One of the chapters discusses the
idea of doubling when you know the opponents are limited and you
suspect the cards may be lying badly for them. In the
quarterfinal match between Reps and Chemla, Josef Piekerek made a
typical ‘tiger double’.
Board 25. Dealer North. E/W Vul. |
|
ª 9 4 2 © A 8 ¨ 8 6 3 § K 10 9 8 3 |
ª
Q J 7 5 © 7
4 ¨ A K 10 § J 7 6 4 |
|
ª
K 6 3 © Q 10
9 5 2 ¨ Q J
2 § A Q |
|
ª A 10 8 © K J 6 3 ¨ 9 7 5 4 § 5 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Cronier |
Gotard |
Chemla |
Piekerek |
|
Pass |
1© |
Pass |
1ª |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
South reckoned he had three tricks coming and the auction had
suggested the opponents were limited. He led a diamond and declarer
won with the queen and played a spade to the queen and a club to the
queen. South took the next spade with the ace and played a second
diamond. Declarer won in dummy, played a spade to his king, cashed
the ace of clubs, played a diamond to dummy, cashed the last spade
and played a heart. North went up with the ace and played his
remaining heart. Southcould win and play a diamond and declarer was
one down.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Von Arnim |
Abecassis |
Auken |
Soulet |
|
|
1NT |
Pass |
2§ |
Dble |
2© |
Pass |
2ª |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
South dutifully led a club and declarer won with the queen. She
played a spade and South went in with the ace to play a second club.
Declarer won, played a spade to the queen and the four of hearts.
When North played low it was all over. South could win with jack and
return a spade but declarer won in hand, crossed to the ace of
diamonds and played the winning spade. North knew he was about to be
endplayed, so he threw the ace of hearts. That certainly avoided the
endplay, as the Tigress in the East seat now claimed nine
tricks. |