Denmark v Turkey – Juniors
Round 13
Both these teams were stuck in mid-table going into Wednesday
morning’s vugraph match and needed to get some big wins quickly if
they were to get into serious contention for a qualifying place for
next year’s World Championship. And, as it turned out, one team did
indeed achieve the sort of result they required.
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
A Q 9 8 ♥ 7 ♦ K 4 2 ♣ A K 9 7 5 |
♠ K 6 5
2 ♥ A K 6 ♦ Q 10 8 5 ♣ Q J |
|
♠ 10 7 4
3 ♥ Q 9 5 ♦ A J 7 6 3 ♣ 10 |
|
♠
J ♥ J 10 8 4 3 2 ♦ 9 ♣ 8 6 4 3 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dalkilic |
Gjaldbaek |
Eskizara |
Schaltz |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
Dble |
Pass |
2♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Houmoller |
Bakan |
Nielsen |
Anter |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
2♣ |
Dble |
5♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
What a difference an opening bid can make. Basar Dalkilic opened
1NT, Kare Gjaldbaek doubled and Martin Schaltz ran to 2♥, ending the auction. That proved to be quite
a comfortable contract, the club fit making up for North’s lack of
heart support. Dalkilic led a club to dummy and Schaltz played a
heart, running the seven to the ace. Dalkilic switched to a spade
and Schaltz rose with the ace, ruffed a spade and played the ♥J to Omer Eskizara’s queen. He ruffed the
spade return and now could not afford to play another round of
trumps in case they split unevenly. Schaltz’s club play was ruffed
but there was just a diamond and a trump to lose from here; +110.
Jonas Houmoller had a 1♦ opening in his methods and that led to a quite
different auction after Huseyin Bakan’s 2♣ overcall. Lars Nielsen made a negative double
and, when Salih Anter’s pre-emptive leap to 5♣ came back to him, felt that he had to bid on
because of the big diamond fit. Bakan doubled 5♦ and there were three spades and a club
to be lost; -300 and 5 IMPs to Turkey.
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
3 2 ♥ A Q 9 7 ♦ J 10 8 3 ♣ Q 10 4 |
♠ A K
7 ♥ K J ♦ K Q 7 5 4 2 ♣ 9 6 |
|
♠ J 8
4 ♥ 10 8 ♦ 9 6 ♣ A K 8 7 3 2 |
|
♠
Q 10 9 6 5 ♥ 6 5 4 3
2 ♦ A ♣ J 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
alkilic |
Gjaldbaek |
Eskizara |
Schaltz |
|
|
Pass |
|
NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Houmoller |
Bakan |
Nielsen |
Anter |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♦ |
3♦ |
3♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
The Turkish E/W had a free run to 3NT and Gjaldbaek led the ♥7 round to declarer’s jack. Dalkilic ducked a
club to South’s jack and Schaltz played back a heart. Gjaldbaek took
his three heart winners and, on seeing Schaltz play hearts upwards,
switched to a diamond to the ace, enabling Schaltz to cash the last
heart for down two; -200. Again, system played a part as
Houmoller had a 1♦
opening and that allowed Anter in with a two-suited overcall of
2♦ on the way to 3NT by
West. Bakan led the ♥Q rather than a
small one and Houmoller won the king. He too ducked a club and the
defence cashed three hearts but now Bakan switched to a spade,
putting more weight on his partner’s bidding than his carding in
hearts which, to be fair, was less clear than at the other table.
Houmoller had only eight tricks, but the run of the clubs squeezed
South between spades and the ♦A to provide the ninth; +600 and 13 IMPs to Denmark.
Board 4. Dealer West. All Vul. |
|
♠
A K 6 ♥ A 4 2 ♦ Q J 3 ♣ 7 6 5 3 |
♠
Q ♥ J 8 3 ♦ 7 6 5 4 2 ♣ J 8 4 2 |
|
♠ 10 8 7 5
3 2 ♥ Q 9 5 ♦ K 10 9 8 ♣ - |
|
♠
J 9 4 ♥ K 10 7 6 ♦ A ♣ A K Q 10 9 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dalkilic |
Gjaldbaek |
Eskizara |
Schaltz |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Houmoller |
Bakan |
Nielsen |
Anter |
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3NT |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All Pass |
|
Gjaldbaek/Schaltz play a strong club that starts at 15 HCP and
have to open 1♦ with
this North hand. 1NT was a relay and an artificial sequence saw them
get to 3NT, which made a lot of tricks – eleven, for +660. The
natural Turkish auction reached a good but by no means secure small
slam. You would feel that 6♣ would have
very good chances, until the trumps proved to be four-zero offside.
That was an unlucky one down for –100 and 13 IMPs to Denmark when it
might well have been 12 the other way on a slightly different
lay-out.
Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul. |
|
♠
- ♥ 7 6 4 3 ♦ J 8 6 5 3 ♣ A K 9 5 |
♠ 10 9 7
2 ♥ 9 5 2 ♦ A 9 ♣ Q J 6 2 ♣
10 |
|
♠ K Q 8 4
3 ♥ A K J 10 8 ♦ Q 10 ♦ Q 10
|
|
♠
A J 6 5 ♥ Q ♦ K 7 4 2 ♣ 8 7 4 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dalkilic |
Gjaldbaek |
Eskizara |
Schaltz |
Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Houmoller |
Bakan |
Nielsen |
Anter |
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
The other side of the Gjaldbaek/Schaltz methods is that they can
open 1♥/♠ to
show only 8-14 HCP. Hearing partner open the bidding, even with such
potentially limited values, was sufficient to convince Schaltz that
a double of 4♠ would be a worthwhile
enterprise. Right he was, though the penalty was not something to
get rich on. Schaltz led his singleton heart and Eskizara won the
ace then played ♠Q from hand. Schaltz
ducked that and declarer played the ♣10.
Gjaldbaek won the club and gave his partner a heart ruff. With two
trumps to come, that was down one for –100. Of course, North did
not have an opening bid in the other room and the danes got to game
via a Bergen raise. There was no reason for Anter to double – and
just a swell, as he failed to defeat the contract. Anter led a club
to the king and back came a heart. Nielsen won the heart and played
♠K and, when that was ducked, a low
spade. Anter won the ♠J and played two
more rounds of trumps. Nielsen won the fourth round of trumps in
dummy and led the ♣Q to the ace and ruff
and had the rest, the ♣J providing a
parking place for his diamond loser; +420 and 11 IMPs to Denmark.
Board 9. Dealer North. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
6 ♥ A K 6 4 2 ♦ K Q 10 4 ♣ J 5 4 |
♠ Q
10 ♥ Q J 8 7 ♦ A 9 6 3 2 ♣ A 2 ♣ K 8 7
3 |
|
♠ 8 7 5
2 ♥ 5 3 ♦ 8 7 5 ♣ K 8 7 3 |
|
♠
A K J 9 4 3 ♥ 10
9 ♦ J ♣ Q 10 9 6 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dalkilic |
Gjaldbaek |
Eskizara |
Schaltz |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Houmoller |
Bakan |
Nielsen |
Anter |
|
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
Schaltz responded 1NT to show spades and the 2♣ rebid showed diamonds. Now, facing 8-14 and
seeing a misfit, Schaltz signed off in 2♠
- well done as he made just eight tricks for +110 after losing both
a spade trick and a club ruff. Anter was facing a normal range
opening bid. Still, perhaps the misfit should have persuaded him
that 3♠ was sufficient at his second turn
– not that this would necessarily have made. Four Spades was quickly
down when Houmoller led ace and another club and received a ruff. He
exited with a heart and Anter took the spade finesse. Now the ace of
diamonds was cashed for down two; -100 and 5 IMPs to Denmark.
Board 10. Dealer East. All Vul. |
|
♠
J 9 2 ♥ 8 6 3 ♦ A 10 7 5 3 ♣ 7 3 |
♠ A K 10
7 ♥ K 10 4 ♦ K J 4 ♣ Q J 9 ♣ K 10
8 4 |
|
♠ Q
3 ♥ A Q 5 2 ♦ 9 6 2 ♥ A Q 5 2
|
|
♠
8 6 5 4 ♥ J 9 7 ♦ Q 8 ♣ A 6 5 2 |
Both Wests opened 1NT and played the no trump game on the lead of
a low diamond to the queen. Both declarers ducked this, which was
necessary if they would otherwise have won and played on clubs – the
normal choice as cashing the majors first could easily establish
five defensive winners when diamonds were four-three all along. Both
did very well indeed, because it is not at all clear that ducking is
correct – put the ace of clubs in the North hand to see why.
Both Souths played back a diamond to the king and ace. Now
Bakan, who knew he did not have an entry, switched to a spade,
putting no pressure on Houmoller, who played on clubs for ten
tricks; +630. Gjaldbaek, who also knew that he did not have an
entry, appreciated the fact that declarer could not know that and
cleared the diamonds anyway. It was still open to Dalkilic to change
tack and try to bring in eight tricks in the majors, when a spade
finesse would have led to defeat, but he got it right, deciding that
this line needed too much compared to the simple hope that the club
ace would be with South; the same ten tricks for +630 and an
interesting push.
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dalkilic |
Gjaldbaek |
Eskizara |
Schaltz |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Houmoller |
Bakan |
Nielsen |
Anter |
1NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
Again both E/W pairs bid to 3NT but from different sides. I
believe that Dalkilic’s 2♦ rebid was just marking time rather than being
anything special systemically – presumably Gjaldbaek would have
doubled had he been told that 2♦ was artificial. Anyway, Schaltz led a heart and
could not have been too impressed when declarer won this with the
six. Eskizara started well, playing a spade to the jack and king.
Back came the ♦K to the
eight from South and low from dummy, followed by the ♦7 to the three from South
and dummy’s ace. Eskizara seems to have convinced himself that South
had shown an even number of diamonds and that the suit was splitting
four-four. This is actually pretty unlikely after the first trick,
but never mind. He crossed to hand with a club to exit with his last
diamond and Gjaldbaek could not believe his luck. He cashed out and
that was two down for –100. Even had diamonds split evenly, it is
not clear that anything good could have happened to allow declarer
to make his contract, as North is then likely to be 4-1-4-4 and can
afford to pitch a spade when the ♥A is
cashed. What declarer missed was an entirely legitimate and
successful line. He has to hope that the diamonds are indeed six-two
and, after winning the second round, must cross to hand with a club
to lead a spade for an avoidance play. If South plays the queen he
ducks and the even break later allows him to make three spade tricks
and ten in all, while if South plays low he goes up with the ace
then plays another spade, and North never gets in to enjoy the
diamonds. So is the contract always cold on a heart lead? No, but it
would be a far-sighted South who managed to go up with the queen on
the first round of spades, thereby stopping the later avoidance play
and, if the queen was ducked, would then find the diamond
switch. n the other room West was declarer and the automatic
diamond lead meant that there was nothing to the play. Declarer
tried for ♠KQ onside and was quickly two
down for –100 and just another dull push.
Board 19. Dealer South. E/W Vul.
|
|
♠
A J 10 5 4 ♥ J 6
2 ♦ A J 9
6 ♣ 3 |
♠ K Q
9 ♥ K 9 5 ♦ Q 3 ♣ A K Q 6 2 |
|
♠ 6
2 ♥ Q 10 7 4 ♦ 10 8 7 5 4 ♣ 9 4 |
|
♠
8 7 3 ♥ A 8 3 ♦ K 2 ♣ J 10 8 7 5 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Dalkilic |
Gjaldbaek |
Eskizara |
Schaltz |
|
|
|
1NT |
Dble |
2♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3♣ |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Houmoller |
Bakan |
Nielsen |
Anter |
|
|
|
Pass |
2♣ |
2♥ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
The very-mini no trump from Schaltz got doubled and Gjaldbaek ran
to 2♠. Once Eskizara did not take any
action, it was normal for Dalkilic to compete with 3♣ and he was left to play there. Note that
Gjaldbaek showed a healthy disrespect for his partner’s opening bid
and did not consider competing despite holding 11 HCP and some
useful distribution. Gjaldbaek led a heart to the eight and nine and
Dalkilic led the ♠Q then when that held,
the ♠9. Gjaldbaek won the ♠10 and continued with the ♠A for dummy to ruff. The defence had no
problem in coming to two diamonds, two clubs and a heart for down
two; -200. Anter did not have an opening bid so Houmoller got to
open a strong artificial 2♣. I do not
have the Turkish systems in front of me but I believe that 2♥ showed one major and 4♣ asked the overcaller to bid his suit. Four
Spades was, of course, quite hopeless after a trump lead to the
queen and ace. Bakan played a diamond to the king and back to the
ace, then ruffed the ♦9
in dummy and was over-ruffed. Houmoller cashed the ♠K and played two top clubs, after which the
defence sat back and waited to collect two heart tricks; -100 and 7
IMPs to Denmark. Denmark won by 64-16 IMPs, just sufficient for
a 25-5 VP win. |