Italy v England – Round 12
Juniors
To bid or not to bid
Although many points are gained or lost by fine declarer play or
excellent defence, the Italian juniors demonstrated that judging
when to bid (and not to bid) could gain many points. They gained
around 30 IMPs on the following three boards from this top match.
Test your judgement against theirs.
To bid or not to bid 1
Dealer East. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
K 1 0 9 8 ♥ K 8 4
♦ A 1 0 9 5
♣ 5 4 |
Sitting East, do you open?
To bid or not to bid 2
Dealer West. All Vul |
|
♠
Q 9 3 ♥ A 4 ♦ A 6 3 ♣ Q 9 8 7 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Pass |
Pass |
|
? |
Sitting East, do you open?
To bid or not to bid (3)
Dealer South. All Vul. |
|
♠
Q 1 0 8 ♥ Q 9 7
♦ A Q J 9 2
♣ A 1 0
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
? |
|
|
Sitting North, do you bid 1NT? The problems refer to Boards 2,
4 and 7. When your decisions are made, please read on to see if you
were miserable or brilliant.
Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
A 6 2 ♥ Q J 6 ♦ 6 ♣ A K Q 8 3 2 |
♠ Q 5 4
3 ♥ 2 ♦ K Q 8 4 3 2 ♣ 9 6 |
|
♠ K 10 9
8 ♥ K 8 4 ♦ A 10 9 5 ♣ 5 4 |
|
♠
J 7 ♥ A 10 9 7 5
3 ♦ J
7 ♣ J 10
7 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Lo Presti |
Burgess |
Di Bello |
Woodcock |
|
|
1NT |
Pass |
2♥* |
3♣ |
All Pass |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Happer |
Boldrini |
Green |
Sbarigia |
|
|
|
2♥ |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All Pass |
|
On our first example Di Bello did very well to open 1NT weak.
2♥ was alerted to North, and explained as
a transfer, but not by Lo Presti to Woodcock, sitting South. N/S
therefore missed the cold game in hearts, and indeed a slam on a
finesse. The bottom line was 10 IMPs from nowhere but
Burgess/Woodcock complained and the director changed the score to
4♥ with an overtrick for N/S for a push.
The right answer was to bid.
Board 3. Dealer South. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
K 10 9 ♥ A ♦ Q 7 4 ♣ K Q 8 7 6 5 |
♠ A J 8 6
5 4 ♥ 10 9 ♦ J 9 2 ♣ A 10 |
|
♠ Q 7
2 ♥ K Q 4 2 ♦ A 10 3 ♣ 9 4 2 |
|
♠
3 ♥ J 8 7 6 5 3 ♦ K 8 6 5 ♣ J 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Lo Presti |
Burgess |
Di Bello |
Woodcock |
|
|
|
Pass |
2♠ |
3♣ |
3♠ |
All Pass |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Happer |
Boldrini |
Green |
Sbarigia |
|
|
|
2♥ |
2♠ |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
Ben Green went one light in 3NT, so Italy had the possibility to
gain their first IMPs here. On some occasions there is a very little
difference in strength when Lo Presti/Di Bello open one- or two- of
a major. 2♠ was natural and weak, so Di
Bello didn’t have any thoughts of game. In 3♠ the defence have a heart ruff If North leads
his singleton ace then switches to a diamond. When Burgess led the
king of clubs, declarer only had four losers. Lo Presti won the ace
and missed the opportunity of simply playing the ace of trumps and
another. When declarer at trick two instead played a heart up, North
could win and switch to a diamond. Of course, declarer was unlucky
as hearts are not likely to be 6-1, nevertheless, South could win
the trick and correctly play a heart, ruffed by North. Very well
defended by Andrew Woodcock not to play a club back. N/S +100 at
both tables meant that no IMPs were exchanged on this board.
Board 4. Dealer West. All Vul. |
|
♠
J 8 5 4 ♥ 7 5 ♦ J 9 8 ♣ K J 6 3 |
♠ 10
2 ♥ K 9 6 2 ♦ K 10 2 ♣ A 10 5 4 |
|
♠ Q 9
3 ♥ A 4 ♦ A 6 3 ♣ Q 9 8 7 2 |
|
♠
A K 7 6 ♥ Q J 10 8
3 ♦ Q 7 5
4 ♣ - |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Lo Presti |
Burgess |
Di Bello |
Woodcock |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Dble |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Happer |
Boldrini |
Green |
Sbarigia |
Pass |
Pass |
1♣ |
1♥ |
Dble |
Pass |
2♣ |
2♦ |
3♣ |
All Pass |
|
|
On our second exhibit, Di Bello passed. This time Woodcock bid
game going off, whilst Boldrini/Sbarigia let their opponents have
the final contract. Note that spades were never mentioned at all;
England +110. 4♠ by Burgess was just
bad judgement and off it went; down three for –300 and 5 IMPs to
Italy. The right answer was not to bid
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
J 6 3 ♥ Q 10 9 7
2 ♦ 9 8 5
3 ♣ 3 |
♠ A 10
8 ♥ A 8 6 4 ♦ K 7 4 ♣ 10 9 7 |
|
♠ K 7
4 ♥ J 5 3 ♦ A Q J 2 ♣ A 6 4 |
|
♠
Q 9 5 2 ♥ K ♦ 10 6 ♣ K Q J 8 5 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Lo Presti |
Burgess |
Di Bello |
Woodcock |
|
Pass |
1♣* |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Happer |
Boldrini |
Green |
Sbarigia |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
2♣ |
Dble |
Pass |
2NT |
Pass |
3NT |
All Pass |
|
|
The lead was the same at both tables: the king of clubs. Both
declarers won the club continuation and from here Green didn’t find
his the way to success as he ran the diamonds then cashed the two
tops in spades and exited with a spade. The position he was playing
for was for North to hold four to the queen and jack in spades with
king and queen in hearts as well. If that had been the case North
would have had to give declarer a heart trick. This was not the day,
however; down one for –50. In the vugraph, the commentators
suggested one option for declarer would be to play a low heart up to
the jack twice, in case North is holding king and queen in hearts.
What they didn’t notice was that the heart suit will become blocked
as dummy will run out of entries. Di Bello took his time then judged
better as he played South for one top honour singleton, thus he
cashed the ace of hearts then played a heart up; +400 and 10
well-earned IMPs to Italy. What if South held a singleton heart
but not an honour; can declarer still succeed? The answer is yes.
After winning the ace of hearts declarer runs all the diamonds.
South has to discard two cards. If he is holding on to his clubs,
pitching two spades, North will have to keep three spades and come
down to only three hearts. On a heart North will be thrown in. He
can win his three heart tricks then has to open up the spade suit. A
low spade must be played, to the queen and ace. When the ten of
spade is played there is no defence. If South keeps three cards
in each black suit and North keeps four hearts, a club will endplay
South. In that case South can win three club tricks but then has to
play a spade to the eight, jack and king, then a spade finesse with
the ten will succeed.
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul. |
|
♠
Q 10 8 ♥ Q 9 7 ♦ A Q J 9 2 ♣ A 10 |
♠ A
3 ♥ A K J 4 ♦ 10 7 6 5 4 3 ♣ 8 |
|
♠ J 9 5
2 ♥ 10 3 2 ♦ K ♣ K Q J 5 2 |
|
♠
K 7 6 4 ♥ 8 6 5 ♦ 8 ♣ 9 7 6 4 3 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Lo Presti |
Burgess |
Di Bello |
Woodcock |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♦* |
1NT |
Dble |
2♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
Pass |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Happer |
Boldrini |
Green |
Sbarigia |
|
|
|
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
All Pass |
|
|
The third hand was even more lucrative for the Italians when
Boldrini passed. The English ended up playing in 2♦ at both tables! Badguess, sorry,
Burgess, bid 1NT and now the English finished in the inglorious
contract of 2♦ doubled
by North. Although, to be fair, once he bids 1NT, not unreasonable
at all, his side is destined for a poor score. When Burgess flew
to 2♦, Lo Presti was
happy to defeat that contract rather than 2♣. Without any hesitation he doubled. You could
actually see how he licked his lips on the vugraph screen. Burgess
had to struggle to avoid 800, but the Italians misdefended slightly;
still two down and –500. That meant another 12 IMPs to Italy when
Happer had gone one off in the Closed Room. The answer was
not to bid, After 11 boards Italy was in leading
position by a remarkable 37-0! From here England started to win
IMPs, although in only small packages.
Board 15. Dealer South. N/S Vul.
|
|
♠
K 7 6 ♥ K 8 7 ♦ J 7 6 2 ♣ A 6 5 |
♠ J 10
3 ♥ Q J 5 3 ♦ Q 10 5 ♣ 10 8 4 |
|
♠ A Q 9 5
2 ♥ - ♦ A K 9 8 3 ♣ K J 3 |
|
♠
8 4 ♥ A 10 9 6 4
2 ♦ 4 ♣ Q 9 7 2 |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Lo Presti |
Burgess |
Di Bello |
Woodcock |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
3♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
Happer |
Boldrini |
Green |
Sbarigia |
|
|
|
2♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All Pass |
|
|
After Sbarigia’s 2♥, Green could show
a two-suited hand by bidding 4♦, and that led to the goal; +420.Di Bello showed a
powerful 16+ with spades and diamonds. Despite nice values in
diamonds, Lo Presti went for a partscore; +170. Should East bid game
anyway? We leave that to you to decide. As the cards lay, the game
was cold and that was a small package of 6 IMPs to England. Italy
really got everything right in this top match – very impressing! The
final score was changed into 56-19 after a ruling on Board 2. Italy
decided not to appeal, so we summarize it to Italy 23 England
7. We hope you liked our examples. However, they contributed to a
fine win for Italy over their nearest rivals England and put them in
a commanding lead after 12 rounds. |