The Sunday Swiss, Round 1
By Jos Jacobs
One of the most interesting confrontations in Sunday morning’s
first round of the Swiss certainly was the match between Welland and
Kowalski: one of the favourite US teams against a strong
Polish-Russian combination. As a result of the two teams’
performances on Saturday they would meet at table 5. Board 1 was
an easy slam, and the boards 2 and 3 turned out to be easy enough
pushes at 3NT except for a nice little squeeze that earned Bobby
Levin an overtrick in one of them.
On board 4, the action
started:
Board 4. Dealer West. All Vul. |
|
♠
Q J 10 7 4 ♥ 8 5 ♦ K Q J 9 4 ♣ Q |
♠ A K 8
3 ♥ A K 9 4 ♦ 7 ♣ A 10 9 2 |
|
♠ 6
2 ♥ Q J 7 6 2 ♦ 10 3 ♣ K J 7 5 |
|
♠
9 5 ♥ 10 3 ♦ A 8 6 5 2 ♣ 8 6 4 3 |
Open Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rosenberg |
Tuszynski |
Rosenberg |
Sarniak |
1♣ |
1♠ |
Dble |
Pass |
4♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
After the straightforward approach by East over 1♠ slam was out of sight when West, with his
unpromising 4-4-4-1 distribution, did not think of any other bid
than 4♥.
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rosenblum |
Levin |
Panina |
Henner |
1♣ |
1♠ |
2♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
Ah the other table, Michael Rosenblum was more inspired. When he
heard a voluntarily bid 2♥ from his
partner, he raised to slam without investigating any further. Right
he was, though it took Larisa Panina some time to start tackling the
clubs by leading to the ace first. So team Kowalski had scored 13
IMPs.
One board later, it was slam time again:
Board 5. Dealer North. N/S Vul. |
|
♠
7 6 2 ♥ J 9 7 6
3 ♦ 10 8
5 ♣ 3 2 |
♠ Q J
10 ♥ A K 10 ♦ 9 6 3 ♣ 10 8 7 5 |
|
♠ A K
8 ♥ 4 ♦ A Q J 2 ♣ K Q J 9 4 |
|
♠
9 5 4 3 ♥ Q 8 5
2 ♦ K 7
4 ♣ A 6 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rosenblum |
Levin |
Panina |
Henner |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
5♠ |
Pass |
6♣ |
All Pass |
1♣ could be anything but 3♣ confirmed a good suit and 19+ h.c.p. The next
two rounds were all cuebids, 3♠ of course
implying diamond control as well. Over 4♠, Michael Rosenblum had a difficult decision,
but probably the key to the hand was the 4♠ bid itself. With the duplication in hearts
known and with both the ♦K and the ♣A missing East
might well have contented herself with 5♣
so if she does not, 5♠ by West seems
justified. As you can see, 6♣ has no
play against any lead, but the old idea of feeling squeezed instead
of really being squeezed struck again. South led a diamond to the
eight, ten and queen, but this should have done no real harm to the
defence. The ♣K went to the ace and South
exited with a spade. On the run of the clubs, North discarded all
his diamonds, starting with the ♦10, which should have clarified the position. Still,
South elected to blank her ♦K and hold on to the hearts, so declarer, already
prepared to concede one down when she played a second round of
diamonds towards the end, could suddenly go up with the ace and drop
the king for her contract. Another 11 IMPs for the
Polish/Russians.
On the next board, the Russians missed a game due to systemic
reasons:
Board 6. Dealer East. E/W Vul. |
|
♠
K 10 9 3 ♥ 4 ♦ J 9 8 6 5 ♣ J 9 4 |
♠ Q
8 ♥ A J 9 6 ♦ A Q 4 ♣ K Q 5 3 |
|
♠ 7 6
5 ♥ Q 8 7 3 2 ♦ 10 3 ♣ A 6 2 |
|
♠
A J 4 2 ♥ K 10 5 ♦ K 7 2 ♣ 10 8 7 |
Closed Room |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Rosenblum |
Levin |
Panina |
Henner |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1NT |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
2♥ |
All Pass |
1NT was 16-18 h.c.p. and 2♥ in this
sequence was explained as natural with no interest for game. The
strange thing is that even though the ♠Q
is a wasted value, game is still a very good proposition, even more
so when vulnerable. No such problems at the other table, so 10
IMPs back to the Americans
Spectacular defensive play was the issue on the very next
board:
Board 7. Dealer South. All Vul. |
|
♠
K J 7 3 ♥ J 7 5 ♦ Q 6 ♣ J 9 7 3 |
♠
8 ♥ K 10 8 4 ♦ 10 5 4 2 ♣ A 8 4 2 |
|
♠ 9 6 4
2 ♥ 9 6 ♦ K J 9 8 7 3 ♣ K |
|
♠
A Q 10 5 ♥ A Q 3
2 ♦ A ♣ Q 10 6 5 |
Against the normal contract of 4♠ by
North, the two Easts had completely different ideas about what to
lead. In the Open Room, Debbie Rosenberg led a trump, won in dummy.
Tuszynski played one more round of trumps and then led the ♣Q from dummy with spectacular effect: West
took his ace, felling his partner’s king. Contract made. The same
play might well have occurred at the other table too, if Levin had
been given a chance to repeat this performance. However, Panina
elected to lead the ♣K which held the
trick. Feeling maybe a little uncomfortable about not being able to
continue the suit, she exited with a heart, won by dummy’s ace. Had
trumps been 3-2, all would have been well for declarer, but when
they proved to be 4-1 Levin could not draw trumps and also remain in
control of the hand. When he led a heart after two rounds of trumps,
Rosenblum took his king and played ♣A and
another to set the contract. Another 12 IMPs. When a better
partscore defence of the last board brought them another 5 IMPs the
Kowalski team had won the match 41-11 or 25-5 V.P. A good start of
the day for them. |